What jury of experts decreed that the Rosa Collection is not/not a pedigree?
As far as I'm concerned -- having done extensive due diligence on the collection -- it is indeed a bona-fide pedigree.
If you hold a different opinion, well, I guess you're entitled to it.
But in reality you are either unfortunately misinformed or purposefully inciting chat-board provocation.
First off, I like the Don Rosa books and I have many in my collection.
The discussion of the collection being officially recognized as a pedigree was previously discussed to death on the Boards. Since CGC listed the collection in a tabular list of recognized pedigrees on their website many thought CGC did recognize them as a pedigree. I finally decided to call CGC and I talked to Eric, I believe. He stated CGC recognizes it as a 'collection' but not as a pedigree.
This is why you see the word 'collection' on the label. With recognized pedigrees, White Mountain, Twin Cities, etc. the word collection is not on the label. So to answer your question of what jury of experts decreed it not a pedigree I answer CGC. I'm sorry if this upsets you.