• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

drdroom

Member
  • Posts

    1,407
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by drdroom

  1. I mean actually this is genius. Machine Boy! Machine Girl! Bolty, the Machine Dog!
  2. This might be the prelim of the prelim, but its for a memorable cover, so I'll take it. It's either Romita (who did the final) or Buscema (who drew on the other side of the board).
  3. Thanks, that's super helpful. Lemme just rustle up one or two of those high-six pieces... where did I put that Itoya...?
  4. This is a truly a wacky turn of events. DC should immediately start publishing a Machine Man comic in the style of Weisinger-era Superman comics. Just to mess with Marvel.
  5. OK, that's interesting. What niggles me though, is 2001 is an important FILM property, created by Clarke and Kubrick. The much later comic adaptation? That seems kind of trivial (much as I like the series). Kamandi is much less known of course, but it's Kirby's own creation. So I'm still puzzled, but the market has spoken. Shoulda bought a bunch of those caveman pages back when the getting was good!
  6. Thanks, you too! And for anyone else reading, Voord is 100% right. Fourth World pages are quite unnecessary. BE LIKE VOORD.
  7. That makes sense (and I've been following that page around too), but I really thought the price was around where I expected. Kamandi pages are plentiful and he doesn't wear spandex, so there's an inherent limit on the price of those pages, no matter how good. For me, that DPS is exquisite, but I've also known collectors to not like it at all. It's the upward pressure on the 2001 page that puzzles me.
  8. You didn't use the word, but, I mean, saying you'd pick a 4-panel 2001 page over, for example, this...?
  9. Yep. You've got to bring more value. There might be some existing relationship advantages--maybe?
  10. Seriously? You hate the Fourth World that much? I mean, I'm glad, I wish everyone did so I could have it all, but those DPS's are pinnacles of Kirby's career.
  11. Scuttlebut I've heard is HA is getting tougher in these negotiations, & I believe they've recently doubled the minimum consignment value from 5k to 10k (?). All which suggests they are not hurting for merchandise.
  12. I was presenting this as a ridiculous no-brainer: panel page with no one on it vs DPS featuring title character at lower price!? But maybe I'm missing something. The 2001 page has Kirby's variation on the famous bone-to-spacecraft cut--does that seem valuable? I'm just really trying to understand this result ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
  13. Which Kirby deal would you choose? Left: 18,750. on Heritage. Right: 16,250. on Comiclink.
  14. Yes, what the actual f-----? I would have predicted 4500.
  15. This is totally baffling to me. It looks like a $300 con sketch.
  16. Arnold as King Conan is not a half-bad idea. Sorry I'm not a powerful studio exec (how many times have I said that?).
  17. It's a tricky page to value and I get why it's had such a rollercoaster ride at auction. Conan + Elric (first app storyline), great, but they're bit players on the page. The top splash panel is really most of the ballgame here, and it's a knockout example of Smith just hitting his artistic stride--but that seems like just the place where his market is weak? Collectors seem to want his fully realized pages, which probably fully starts with Conan 24. What would a panel page from Song or Red Nails go for?
  18. Good point. Or a page from one of William Blake's books, which are in fact broken up, and which I recently had the pleasure of seeing several examples at the The Getty. So age seems to help (and, shallow as it may seem, I think color helps). If we step away from the modern/contemporary art world, so vigorously skewered by Dr Balls above, and think about the future gallery market for historical popular art, I don't doubt our grandchildren will be seeing exhibits of Herriman, McKay, Gould, Tezuka, Kirby, Crumb, etc., as, on occasion, we already do. The true originals. But just as we don't much recall the names of guys who were influenced at the time by, say, Blake or Hogarth, I'm not so sure about the swath of superhero art following in Kirby's wake, or the bulk of manga post-Tezuka.
  19. Quadruple! It's the climatic page of of one of the top five or so greatest 4th world issues. In FF terms, it's a whole team splash from #52 or something.
  20. Back to the topic at hand, Comiclink results: Glory Boat splash: 48,262 hammer. Kamandi 16 DPS: 16,250 hammer. What do we think? To me Glory Boat was a good deal for the buyer, Kamandi about right or a little low.
  21. That's right, the whole buyer motivation matrix is different in the two markets. Nostalgia in particular is highly suspect in the fine art world, which prefers innovation and "importance" (YMMV). So demand would have to be created in acceptable fine art standards, like GrapeApe suggested with his "Primitive pop cultural expression." But it's a heavy lift, and IMHO it would have happened by now if it was going to.
  22. As a jaded art world habitué, the problem I see with this is that no one in the art world thinks comics are primitive. Sixty years ago, when Lichtenstein was treating comic panels as essentially factory-made artifacts, you had some of that attitude, but even those same people held Krazy Kat in high regard. Nowadays comics are revered and referenced all the time. They (we, I guess) just believe that comic original art is made primarily for reproduction, and even if it looks pretty good on a gallery wall, no one is ever convinced that it was purpose built to be on that wall. There's a word you hear sometimes, "auratic," meaning the object itself has an aura, a presence and sense of wholeness that reproduction can't capture. In fine art, that's what you want in the single object. In comics, it's the published comic that is auratic, potentially. A page from it is just a production artifact, and this can be deeply cool, expensive, and even beautiful, but it's fundamentally a different category, and not the business that the art world is in. All that said, I've seen Kirby double splashes hold their own, auratically, on a wall with a Leon Golub, so it's not impossible.
  23. I had to stay out of this convo, because for me to argue with people who believe Kirby was a BAD writer and Lee was a GOOD writer would be like debating vintages of Cabernet Franc with a tribe of Cro-Magnons or something, ...but I just happened to discover something pertinent to your complaint: the published version added a "--" after the offending exclamation point. This might be even more aggravatingly improper, but it does, I think, address the problem inasmuch as it tends to re-connect the two phrases as a single sentence. What do you think, better?
  24. Classic Alex Johnson just-the-facts post.