• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Illiterati-migration

Member
  • Posts

    11,928
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Personal Information

  • Occupation
    Teen Heartthrob
  • Location
    Hip-deep in it.

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Yeah, I saw the larger scan... I said 9.2 because that lower right corner looked somewhat blunted. Again, something that might change with a larger look. If the corners are as sharp as you say, then I would think it is a strong 9.4. However, I don't think it has any chance of going above a CGC 9.6. Isn't that sort of printing defect prohibited in 9.8 and above?
  2. 9.2/9.4? Could be lower. Tough to tell with such a small scan.
  3. Nope, my 9.4 keeper. Only copy which I've seen with pretty well perfect QP. Unfortunately, the placement of the price, issue number, and comics code is too close to the right side. This copy is actually perfectly centered. Hacks fluked out another win. Later, I'm stuck in a town more pathetic than Olathe. No way and not possible! Try not to drop the soap!
  4. Nope, my 9.4 keeper. Only copy which I've seen with pretty well perfect QP. Unfortunately, the placement of the price, issue number, and comics code is too close to the right side. This copy is actually perfectly centered.
  5. Its a phony for anyone who doesnt already know. Its graded a 9.4 by PGX. See their gallery for proof. Oh, and Deathlok had nothing to do with it. Personally, I find it hilarious that you couldn't tell that from the picture. Desire blinds, I guess. Fooled everyone else. Actually, you can tell from the picture without having to look *that* hard.
  6. Its a phony for anyone who doesnt already know. Its graded a 9.4 by PGX. See their gallery for proof. Oh, and Deathlok had nothing to do with it. Personally, I find it hilarious that you couldn't tell that from the picture. Desire blinds, I guess. So does chronic, obsessive masturbation. Not all that much really..... Oh, come on... you're so busy replying to every single post here that there is NO way you could be masturbating enough to actually cause a loss of vision.
  7. Its a phony for anyone who doesnt already know. Its graded a 9.4 by PGX. See their gallery for proof. Oh, and Deathlok had nothing to do with it. Personally, I find it hilarious that you couldn't tell that from the picture. Desire blinds, I guess. So does chronic, obsessive masturbation.
  8. God, I hope his price isn't a horrifying night of hot, scandalous, monkey love with a comic-collecting hermaphrodite. Greggy's all booked up this week. See? Didn't take the easy shot that time.
  9. It's really not that surprising when you take into consideration various factors such as the reputation of the dealer, the age of the label, the page quality, and the fact that most G.I. Joe collectors (like Dung) are inbred troglodytes who would be equally entertained eating their own toenails as reading a comic book. Count on Khaos to correct your grammar and come up with a zinger here and there. Other than that, he's kind of useless. Say, speaking of Zingers and other spongy, cream-filled phalluses, does yours still work, Buffalo Bob? Or do you just tuck it back between your legs when you dance in front of the mirror?
  10. It's really not that surprising when you take into consideration various factors such as the reputation of the dealer, the age of the label, the page quality, and the fact that most G.I. Joe collectors (like Dung) are inbred troglodytes who would be equally entertained eating their own toenails as reading a comic book.
  11. Ah, the darkness creeps for the poor transgendered G.I. Joe collector...
  12. Yeah, some of your warped books are there. If you wouldn't have dragged your feet for a YEAR, you might have gotten the good ones!