• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Frank Castle 74

Member
  • Posts

    27
  • Joined

Everything posted by Frank Castle 74

  1. When does Evil Ernie first technically appear? Many agree that Evil Ernie #1 is not his first appearance, that his first appearance is really in Comic Newsletter #23. When does he actually first appear in printed form?
  2. Most vehemently argue that Superman is first seen flying or reasonably presumed to be flying in Action Comics #10. However, according to sources that I've been able to find, it was later clarified that the panel(s) in which he is seen or depicted to be in "flight" were actually a creative mistake by Leo Nowak--who was new to the comic and character. Various sources also suggest that it wasn't until the Fleischer films that Superman was officially granted the ability of flight. Others argue that it is in fact, Action Comics #123 that he is first "officially" described to have the ability to fly; a narration bubble states the following in the issue: " Meanwhile, the punchboard plotters are unaware of a colorful figure flying overhead - - Superman, himself!” In other words, in issue #123, not only is Superman dawn in positions--in mid-air--that would suggest the ability to fly, but it is also explicitly mentioned by the book's narrator. Although, there is yet another comic that vies for the definitive comic book depiction of Superman's ability to fly. This occurs in Superman issue #30; Superman is seen in several panels--zig-zagging through the sky--alongside Mr. Mxyzptlk. Superman even states to Mr. Mxyzptlk "I thought I was the only man who could fly!!" Considering everything mentioned here, when do you think Superman's ability to fly was definitively depicted in a comic book?
  3. Feast your eyes! Here's a one-of-a-kind, and it is THE ONLY COPY with everyone's signature. Justice League Adventures #1 SS CGC 9.8 - Signed by Maria Canals-Barrera (Hawk-Girl), Susan Eisenberg (Wonder Woman), Phil Lamarr (Green Lantern), Carl Lumby (Martian Manhunter), George Newbern (Superman), Andrea Romano (Voice Casting Director for Justice League, Batman: The Animated Series, etc.), Bruce Timm (Writer/Producer/Director/Creator for Batman: The Animated Series, Superman: The Animated Series, Justice League: The Animated Series, etc.), Kevin Conroy (Batman), and Michael Rosenbaum (Flash).
  4. I could see your point, but I always wondered how many of those SS copies are signed by Stan, and how many have 4 or 5 signatures? It's incredibly difficult to maintain a 9.8 grade with this number of signatures--especially now. It's my understanding that CGC recently stated they wouldn't guarantee the grade of signature series submissions anymore; if you send an already graded book to them--even if it's a CGC book--they won't guarantee you'll retain the grade when it's signed and returned to you. I wish I could have kept the two here.
  5. X-Men: Dark Phoenix, Black Widow, Thor: The Dark World, and Incredible Hulk are all are severely lacking; I've never praised any of these films or recommended them. In fact, I made it a point to discourage others from seeing them. I agree that adding Darkseid was positive (it sets things up for future films), but given the circumstances surrounding the release of Snyder's cut, it wasn't as impactful as it could have been if everything had gone accordingly--as you mention. This was the main point that I was trying to make. Criticism of various Marvel and DC films shouldn't be controversial.
  6. There is no point I'm trying to make, I'm asking a legitimate question. Mentioning a child's death to make me seem ridiculous for asking is outrageous and exploitative. The film was first released WITHOUT DARKSEID. Then FOUR YEARS LATER (long after average moviegoers had lost interest in the film) they re-released Snyder's cut of the film. The initial excitement and interest around the film had passed, and THEN after four years, they RE-RELEASED it AGAIN with Darkseid. New fans--unfamiliar with the comics--would see this as a gimmick/money-grab or possibly a rip-off of the Thanos character--even though people who are familiar with the comics know this isn't true. You need the ability to view things from the lens of someone unfamiliar with comics. You do understand when you wait four years and then release something again--even if you include new or compelling components to the story--it isn't going to produce the same effect as if it were being seen or released for the first time? What I'm explaining is just basic logic at this point.
  7. It's my understanding that CGC will no longer guarantee your submission will retain its original grade; I forgot exactly where I read that. Among several other reasons, this is why lots of multi-signature books are commanding exorbitant prices. That is a huge grade drop; it's possible someone may have dropped or mishandled the book. I've been reluctant to send my signature series books for additional signatures.
  8. Were they planning to include Darkseid since they first began production on the first Wonder Woman movie?
  9. It became suspicious when I attempted to snipe but was repeatedly logged out on CL. That had never happened to me before.
  10. Agreed. I appreciate your willingness to discuss things civilly. As far as DC films go, I wish they'd take things a little more seriously at WB. These are incredible storylines they have to work with and they're not putting people who are passionate about comics or familiar with characters in charge of making the film.
  11. I like DC and Marvel equally; I grew up watching Batman: The Animated Series, Justice League, Superman: The Animated Series, and Justice League: Unlimited. But I gravitated towards Marvel movies after Batman (1989). My comic book collection is a mixed bag, with lots of Marvel and DC. As far as modern DC and Marvel films go, I just feel Marvel is more organized. Are they perfect? No. But they have an overall better track record.
  12. You do realize I was speaking on three separate topics in my original post? Ha-ha! Are you the contrarian of this forum? I have neither the time nor inclination to waste any further effort on this exchange. The world is full of people who will disagree with you; I'm willing to agree to disagree; I chose to lead a cancer-free life.
  13. This still doesn't take away from the fact that the film--when originally released--did not include Darkseid. The impact of the character and what it meant for the franchise in the future was tainted. It's like a surprise birthday party you're throwing for someone, and they walk in and you yell surprise--only their significant other wasn't present for the moment. So you plan another surprise the next day--with their significant other there. Only this time their expression is less excited and it doesn't really hold the same meaning. Horrible example, I know. But hopefully amusing. I can only assume that you're a serious DC fan, so I understand if what I'm saying might be upsetting. But you can't deny things were not handled very well at WB.
  14. I wasn't referring to the comics, I was referring to the film not including the character, to begin with. They didn't strategically craft Darkseid into film continuity--as Marvel did with Thanos; instead, they said "oh, hey! let's add Darkseid---we kind of forgot that part." That's what I was saying; that's what I meant by afterthought. I know who Darkseid is and I'm familiar with the source material.
  15. They re-released the film with Darkseid; that's my point. It's a pivotal character and they didn't originally plan the movie to include the character--understand? They added him after the fact. I'm talking about the FILM, my friend. And I said political climate, not commentary, you might need an eye exam.
  16. *******CLOSED****** Both of these books are from my personal collection and are up for auction on eBay. If you are interested in either one, please take a look at the listings on eBay. FEATURED BOOKS: X-Men #221 Signature Series CGC 9.8 - Signed by Stan Lee, Chris Claremont, Jim Shooter, and Marc Silvestri. X-Factor #6 Signature Series CGC 9.8 - Signed by Stan Lee, Bob Layton, Louise Simonson, Joe Rubinstein, and Bob Mcleod.
  17. *******CLOSED****** Both of these books are from my personal collection and are up for auction on eBay. If you are interested in either one, please take a look at the listings on eBay. FEATURED BOOKS: X-Men #221 Signature Series CGC 9.8 - Signed by Stan Lee, Chris Claremont, Jim Shooter, and Marc Silvestri. X-Factor #6 Signature Series CGC 9.8 - Signed by Stan Lee, Bob Layton, Louise Simonson, Joe Rubinstein, and Bob Mcleod.
  18. Both of these books are from my personal collection and are up for auction on eBay. If you are interested in either one, please take a look at the listings on eBay. FEATURED BOOKS: X-Men #221 Signature Series CGC 9.8 - Signed by Stan Lee, Chris Claremont, Jim Shooter, and Marc Silvestri. X-Factor #6 Signature Series CGC 9.8 - Signed by Stan Lee, Bob Layton, Louise Simonson, Joe Rubinstein, and Bob Mcleod.
  19. I didn't enjoy any of the recent DC films; they seemed absurdly ostentatious and desperate to keep pace with Marvel. Throwing Darkseid in as an afterthought in Justice League is just insulting to comic book fans. Scrapping the current Justice League projects and continuity and starting fresh wouldn't be such a horrible idea. Honor Jack Kirby's legacy with talented direction, (not famous but) quality actors, and writing that remains true to the source material. The Justice League films relied primarily on extravagant special effects and the current political climate to manufacture their short-lived success. Thank the New and Old Gods that the New Gods movie was canceled. Do it right or don't do it at all.