No 1 Records

Not the same character, the Gwenpool on Deadpool's Secret Secret Wars #2 was Gwen Stacy. See: https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Gwendolyn_Poole_(Earth-TRN565)#Trivia

It's the same with ebay today. The sellers think it's VF and the buyer think it's VG... :-(

$ 2 for a reader or filler $ 20 for a collectible $ 200 for a key $ 2000 for the grail

Hulk Abomination Sandman Absorbing man Moon Knight Fantastic Four Gwenpool Red Sonja Kamandi Legion of super-heroes Wildfire Modesty Blaise Calvin and Hobbes Fat Freddy's Cat Zippy the Pinhead Socker-Conny

No it's not racism to demand equality and I never said so, but it is to exclude people based on there race (if that was the case). My spelling depends on I'm not from an English speaking country, but I does my best. I'm finished with it all for now. It seems to be a storm in a water-glass. At least the template was were very vague and doesn't have any specific numbers for representation. Just a clause that that the author (Dr. Stacy L. Smith) should be the judge of how well the studio succeed. I don't suspect Bries rider is much different and I don't think it will be public. The template doesn't mention interviews, but I don't have any reason to suspect that part of it to be harder. http://assets.uscannenberg.org.s3.amazonaws.com/docs/inclusion-rider-template.pdf P.S. Im happy Brie didn't act racist.

Yes I do understand, she can demand who she will work with and it is based on race and gender. Therefore it's rasism and sexism. If she put up a rule that only so or so many % would be allowed to be of this or that race or gender, she will exclude many. It's racism to exclude people based on race, it's sexism to exclude people based on gender and that is just what she's doing.

Not asking, demanding. Even demanding equal representation is good, as long as it doesn't mean that you have to exclude people based on race and gender. How would that happen? Employing more people? I think "EQUAL representation" is rasist, if you don't consider merits. For example I would consider it be rasist to demand that only 1,4% of movie makers and journalist should be jews, even thou that would be "EQUAL representation". A demand of not discriminating based on race and gender, only to employ based on merits. That would have been something everybody would have benefited from in the long run.

Not again... it's not asking it's a demanding. If they have to exclude a number of white men in order to meet her demand it's exclusion. Or do you think they just hire some extra black women to meet her demands? Two wrong don't make one right. If the media companies from the beginning didn't exclude minorities and women it would be inclusion. To make a second exclusion on men and majorities make it two exclusions, not one inclusion. The result in numbers might be the same, but it's still exclusion based on race and gender. Two wrong don't make one right.

No. If she asked for a balanced representation I've been with her 110%. She was demanding representation based on race and gender. The only way to meet her demands is to exclude people based on their race and gender. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brie_Larson "she became one of the first actors to incorporate an inclusion rider provision in her film and press tour contracts" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclusion_rider I don't think she is a rasist or a sexist in her heart or in her personal life, but her action is.

Thats one way to put it. Another way is: She’s excluding reviewers bases on their skin colors and genders instead of their merits and thats not good for the audience that wants a fair and a non-biased information.