• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

AbsoluteCarnage

Member
  • Posts

    3,113
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by AbsoluteCarnage

  1. Ah. Appolgies @Yorick  Didn't think it would have been warped based on the cert# but there are outliers from prior to reholdergate. Something about pressed books when the well has any warp seems to be doing much more significant damage than books that weren't pressed as those faults / issues that were there prior come back in abundance. Even so, surprising that the well was warped prior to the re-holder scam realization and this issue became consistent with the inner wells. I suppose as some have posted it had been happening in random scenarios far longer but just not consistently so much. Seeing as it is a white cover hopefully those can be re-pressed and slabbed once this issue is resolved and books get back to lying flat in the inner wells.

  2. On 9/20/2024 at 10:10 AM, electricprune said:

    Yorick, if this is your book I apologize. This critique isn’t towards the owner.

    Would anyone that is reading this thread or posting here pay fair market 9.8 OW/W pricing for this book? Take a close look at the scan before you answer.

    That looks like something outside of this range of topic tbh. Maybe a reholder scam. There has been significant damage done with the warped inner wells but that doesn't look to be the case on this book as warped inner well books seem to show up nicely in CGC scans and then after time the color breaking creases potentially appear depending on the severity of the "after Bend" from inner well. Cert date on the book takes it back to around reholder scam times as well. Not sure when that label comes from.

  3. On 3/27/2024 at 10:20 PM, Stefan_W said:

    So this is kind of strange. I was curious to see if there were any other copies at 9.9, and when I checked the certification number it would not link to the census. As a work-around I checked other GSX and linked to the census that way, and no 9.9 copies show up even though the cert number checks out.

    **EDIT** not sure if there is normally a lag between grading and a book appearing the census. It seemed odd to be but it could be perfectly normal. 

     

    census.JPG

    I had an ASM 291 I believe at the time - CGC 9.8 SS that there was 1/1 on census. It took a couple weeks before it showed up as 2/2 on census data.  I could see my graded book on my account but the census didn't change until a little while after pics were taken by CGC and I received my initial comic data. Not sure on the exact time frame between certification and census updates but it's most definitely not right away whereas you can bet they'd be showing the book off right away.

     

  4. I have a lot of nostalgia from buying them off the newsstands and at comic shops and love many of the covers but as far as trying to get them all in 9.8 I could never see the return from collecting them as in the back of my head I was thinking "how many people actually collect PPTSSM???" Left wondering if even breaking even on something that seems to not move too much pricewise upon possibly having to move them later on, I stayed away from Web of and this title but still..... many nice covers.

    One hell of a collection at any rate and can't blame someone for going on a fishing expedition. Someone with too much money might pay for the convenience of a full collection that well assembled. Who knows.

    A few of my favorite covers other than the obvious Kraven's Last Hunt and early books in the run were:

    Spectacular Spider-Man (1976) 101 - John Byrne

     

    Spectacular Spider-Man (1976) 109 - Full Moon - Night - Spidy - Sin - Posing

    Spectacular Spider-Man (1976) 116 - Sabretooth - Peter Parker - Spiderman - Prey For Sabretooth - Fight

     

    Spectacular Spider-Man (1976) 119 - Richard Buckler

    Spectacular Spider-Man (1976) 127

     

     

  5. On 3/1/2024 at 5:40 AM, DougC said:

    maybe i'm the one taking crazy pills but this just looks like a pre-2016 slab, the inner well used to angled at the corners as the label was loosely attached.

    Here is an example of the difference between pre-2016 and current slabs:

    image.png.dbe36692e03320293ef6c075321af55b.png

    image.thumb.png.a06cd7550e6597f144feb6ff79e384fd.png

     

    2008 grading for the book in question so you'd be correct on that assumption. Personally I've had the labels bending out or folding weirdly inside well on some of those old books too and it annoyed me to the point that I'd sell them rather than waste double money on shipping back and forth just to fix a label that never should have been bending strangely in the case in the first place. Book looks like a 9.8 to me from front scan that was posted at any rate. 

  6. On 2/29/2024 at 3:48 PM, awakeintheashes said:

    Be careful out there. Nowhere in the title or description does the seller note this is the facsimile. The barcode is conveniently blurry as well. Surprised they didn’t use different lighting to make the red marvel logo look not so red.

    Ultimate Fallout: Spider-Man No More #4

     

    Publication year of 2022 in item specifics but some don't look at all details. Shady Acres sales distribution nonetheless lol 

  7. On 2/28/2024 at 2:26 PM, Mr. Zipper said:

    Stan was notorious for signing in areas of poor contrast. Probably because he was half out of it after being driven like a $2 mule at public signings the last few years of his life. From what little I can see, nothing obviously wrong with it.  

    Very true. There was one during the McFarlane opp that Todd nearly signed over Stan's signature due to the darkness of where it was and then made a remark about it on the book of some sort. I tried to look up the book in the McFarlane signing thread from awhile back but all the videos are unavailable and think I saw it during one of them.

  8. On 2/26/2024 at 9:03 PM, Stefan_W said:

    He isn't wrong.

    When I make comic decisions that are longer term I often think along the lines of "if I get hit by a bus tomorrow, what will help my family the most in the long term after I am gone?" My wife is not a comic person and would be likely to take pennies on the dollar for someone to haul most of my collection away. To counter that, I have a lot of slabs that will do well at auction and asked a friend to help her send them in if something happens. We are not immortal and the unexpected is a part of life. 

    image.png.4de7256f9122607acb181cbe023a66fa.png