• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Fiacs0.o

Member
  • Posts

    14
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. Have a reholder sub where none of the grades are showing in the 'status', pop report link gives inaccurate numbers and no scans of the cards are attached to the cert. Emailed over 2 weeks ago but been given the BGS treatment lmao
  2. Your cards will 100% have a very small dent on the surface somewhere. It may be hard to find, but it'll be there. PSA is the same, a mint card with a miniscule dent in the surface somewhere will get you a 6 by default. Your surface subgrade for these was probably a 6, but other higher subgrades will have dragged it up to a 7 (if you could see the subgrades that's what you'd find anyways) . Hope that helps, low grades on minty looking cards can definitely be confusing sometimes.
  3. There's no way they can possibly know if they were damaged on their way to them or back to you. Those metal cards are notoriously fragile in transit which is why grading companies all stopped grading them months ago. I'm surprised anyone is still sending them tbh to thought that was pretty common knowledge at this point.
  4. Would be great to hear from CGC why this happened, especially centering. Bet you don't hear a word though. Grading companies are all the same at the end of the day man, they're just throwing darts at numbers half the time.
  5. Thankyou for fixing the issues I had Paul. In all seriousness though, $100usd is absolutely outrageous for a 4*4*4" box. We all know that around $60 of that would be going straight into the bank as profit for CGC, regardless of who it's sent with.
  6. Okay great, could you also make sure that is fixed up at the same time too please? That definitely hasn't been taken off what I have been charged either. I signed up on March 1st this year. Thanks mate.
  7. Thankyou for that, I appreciate it! There is a second thing I'm not clear on, is the $150 of credit for signing up only applicable on the first order or something? Prior to this I've only had a single express card graded by CGC, which should mean there is $100 of credit remaining if it carries over... Couldn't find any clear wording on that either. Thanks again mate. Kyle
  8. Yeah from what I've read on these forums, Paul is about the only one who helps anyone with anything. Hopefully he can do something about it, even though it definitely wouldn't fall under his job description. Sadly, the total lack of customer service alone is such a negative for CGC that it pretty much destroys any upsides they may have over PSA.
  9. Yep, followed the instruction to the T. When I woke up this morning and read the email I wasn't far short of livid. It's just going to have to be dealt with through social media I feel... That and telling anyone and everyone over here in Australia about it. I work in Retail management, and if either I or any of my staff mislead and then shafted a customer like this there'd be hell to pay, and I wouldn't blame them.
  10. I'd say they probably guarantee anything that'll get your money into their pockets, and nothing related to a pop report or customer service 😡🤬
  11. You're telling me! At this point it's even starting to put me off buying CGC graded cards on the second hand market!
  12. Just received the reply today. A $50 credit for 'next time' and basically her going back on what was agreed. Not even close to good enough. Membership credit doesn't seem to have been applied either. Will just use socials in future for updating people, especially those in Australia who are getting railed with your $100USD shipping charges. You literally charged $100 to send 1 card. Then another $100 to send the remaining 9. I'm done.
  13. So, I sent in a standard submission from Australia back in April sometime. It contained about 10 cards, one of which was a 'stage error' Blastoise. Prior to sending the submission to CGC I emailed them and asked if the submission could be returned as a single package, so as to avoid paying $100 USD to return only the Blastoise (error grading forces it into a seperate submission on the site) and another $100USD to return the other regular tier cards. I was told they could do that no worries, and just to write that on the submission sheet, so I did. Fast forward to a couple of weeks ago and I find bank account being charged $150USD and a notification that the Blastoise only had been shipped. Great, now I'm worried! (Not too mention that they've not used the credit on the account that they presumably give you when signing up) So I email them to make sure I'm not going to be charged for shipping the others, as per my request of sending everything together. No reply.... This morning I wake up to bring charged for everything, including shipping, for the remainder of the cards. Apart from the fact of how CRIMINAL that $100USD is to charge international customers to have their cards returned, the total lack of customer service is abysmal, and I will NEVER use CGC again.
  14. Put it this way, if they WANTED a pop report for trading cards, they would already have one. We have a brand new grading company that just popped up in Australia that would have to be insignificant capital-wise in comparison to CGC, and they came out with a pop report AT LAUNCH. With every card being catalogued/barcoded already, you cannot convince me that it's too big of a job for anybody worth their salt in coding.