• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Kripsys99

Member
  • Posts

    340
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Kripsys99

  1. I must have missed that. Care to point me to where someone posted it? Edit: Used the search term "police" for the last month, and found no results indicating anyone had actually called police.
  2. I continue to be surprised at the fact that, as far as I can tell, no one has yet to call the police of local jurisdiction to report this matter. I think a lot of people are making this more complicated than it needs to be. If you paid your neighbor $50 to park your car in his garage while you were away on an extended holiday, then got back and found out he'd sold it, who would you call, and what would you tell them? Simple - you'd call the police, and you'd tell them your neighbor stole your car. This situation really isn't any different. Maybe someone has called and got an unfavorable response - but if that's the case, they haven't shared same on the boards, and they probably haven't done a good job conveying the size and scale of the thefts perpetrated. People can call lawyers and consumer protection advocates all they want - I don't personally see those avenues yielding much (between Mike's apparent financial situation on the civil side, and the concept of frustration of contract on the consumer protection side), but more power to you. However, I can't understand the reluctance to at least call the police as well. Is it out of some sense of misplaced loyalty to Mike as a fellow collector? I also don't understand why people seemingly think that contacting the police forecloses one's ability to seek civil remedies. At least in my jurisdiction, it doesn't - civil lawyers actually encourage clients to report things like this to the police: a) because it's expected, and demonstrates the seriousness of your claim; and b) because a finding of criminal guilt "beyond a reasonable doubt" sure helps a civil claim which needs to be proven on a "preponderance of evidence/balance of probabilities" (ie: the police do the leg work for you). Also, I challenge anyone to find a lawyer willing to take this case on contingency (ie: the lawyer only gets paid out of any judgement awarded or settlement reached). Given what we know about the state of Mike's finances, any lawyer worth their salt will be demanding cash up front - and that should tell you all you need to know about the lawyer's belief (or lack thereof) in the likelihood of being able to actually collect on any judgement rendered. To those of you who are still waffling about whether to contact a lawyer/consumer protection, or the police of local jurisdiction, I would simply say: Best of luck to all.
  3. Is there a years old, super active Kirby Covers thread on this site? Cuz there's an Adams one...
  4. Agreed. Fortunately, they have found a venue (these boards) to crowd source advice, with the heart-shaped "like button" serving as a defacto voting system to show which proposed solutions the collective thinks are the most likely to succeed. Of course the people out books aren't obligated to follow any advice posted on the boards - and obviously taking advice from internet strangers isn't always the prudent course of action. That being said, my experience has been that there are numerous individuals on these boards with professional experience relevant to this situation (without getting into my entire professional biography, I count myself among them), and a kinship among the boards members borne out of our mutual love of collecting which predisposes us to look out for the best interests of other boardies (that goes even for @Mr. Zipper, with whom I have had vociferous disagreements in this thread).
  5. Sigh...you can simultaneously feel empathy for someone, and whole heartedly disagree with/criticize how they maneuver the misfortune they've been handed. You can think/feel two things at the same time (why is this such a novel concept at this point in our society?). I sympathize with Mike for the difficulties he is currently going through in his life...but I don't condone how he has handled those difficulties, and I won't support him in same. I empathize with Mike's victims...but I think they are doing themselves (and more crucially, others) a disservice by letting Mike skate in the hopes of getting their books back, and I won't support them in same. I will criticize anyone who engages in actions which I feel are detrimental to themselves or others - and I would submit that they should only feel "shame" if they believe those criticisms are valid. And the only thing easier than playing a "keyboard tough guy" (nice by the way) is being a virtue-signaling "keyboard warrior", offering platitudes ("thoughts and prayers") instead of concrete solutions, and criticizing those who do. After all, no one will ever chide you for supporting victims (no matter how misguided that support may be). My preference is to share my informed opinion, cultivated through extensive personal and professional experience with crime-related financial loss (hence the empathizing rather than sympathizing with Mike's victims - I have been through this, and put my money where my mouth is in the past you sanctimonious Pickle Rick - have you?), and even more extensive experience holding those responsible accountable. I would rather see the victims take some of the power back, and at least give themselves a chance for a positive outcome (if not the recovery of their books, at least the accountability of the person responsible), rather than placating their current feelings in a manner which is detrimental to their own self interest. For now, I would invite you to feel free to carry on your name calling and mudslinging via DM if you insist on persisting in this vein.
  6. You can call it a "diplomatic approach", or "being practical to achieve a solution", or dress it up with whatever language you want - it's still subservience...that's why one has to "swallow [their] pride" when they do it. There was a time in this whole ordeal where such an approach may have been practical (in an "every man for himself" kind of way). I think we're long past that point, and have been for some time. And I universally disagree with the sentiment that victims are unerring and/or have no greater societal obligation when deciding whether or not to hold perpetrators responsible for their criminal actions - failing to do so has consequences which reverberate beyond the victim's own personal situation and feelings. Nonetheless, I feel a great deal of empathy for those who have been victimized in this situation - it's never good when people are hurt.
  7. One complainant - I agree, the police likely do nothing. All of the individuals who have posted on this board contacting the same law enforcement agency, and cross referencing their complaints? Police would have no choice but to take action.
  8. Fair enough. What I take issue with are the posts (like the one I quoted) which state some version of "I hold no ill will towards anyone. I just want my items returned." It perpetuates a feedback loop of subservience to Mike in the hopes that not ticking him off may result in him returning books (and I would argue, encourages others to do same), but in actuality, only serves to delay individuals who might otherwise take concrete steps which could legitimately result in them getting their books back (and/or Mike being held accountable). It's my personal belief that such delays may have given Mike the time to offload more books illicitly, and/or to devise a means of escaping criminal liability (ie: the "break-in"). The posts I would like to see would go something like this: "On [Date] I sent [# of books] to Mike for [services requested]. I paid Mike [$ amount] for those services. Photos of the books sent can be seen below. To date, despite repeated efforts to contact Mike, he has not returned either the funds or my books. On [date] I made a complaint to the [police of jurisdiction where Mike is located] advising them that my books and funds had been stolen. The details of my complaint are as follows: - [File #] - [Investigator name and contact info]. I informed the investigator that there are numerous other victims who may be reaching out to them in the near future."
  9. TWO POSTS EARLIER: TWO POSTS EARLIER: I can't believe that anyone could stumble upon this thread at this point, read through it, and come to the conclusion that begging Mike to send their books back is the answer:
  10. Very true. And unfortunately, this development will complicate things considerably for those who waited to report this matter to police, and don't have significant evidence that Mike, for example, had already sold their book on eBay prior to the alleged "break-in" to his business. I could see Mike escaping criminal culpability regarding outstanding books simply by stating that the books in question were stolen during the "break-in". And I've already made my thoughts clear about the likely ineffectiveness of any potential civil action. This is a prime example of why you don't negotiate with terrorists (or in this case thieves). Unfortunately, I think a lot of people will be regretting not having reached out to law enforcement earlier. At this point, not only will they not get their money or their books back - they may also see the person who took those things evade responsibility for his actions. Hope is not a plan, and simply hoping to get one's books back was never a plan either. I would still be reaching out to law enforcement regardless.
  11. Blood from a stone. Money is blood, Mike is the stone. Throwing money at a lawyer to seek a civil judgement against Mike is, in my opinion, throwing good money after bad. All of this negotiation with an individual who STOLE your books and your money is muddying the waters, and making what is a clear CRIMINAL matter (between a thief and his victims) appear to be an ongoing civil matter (between a business owner and his customers). I understand the allure of trying to stay on Mike's good side, in the hopes of getting your books back from him directly - but most of you won't. And your money is clearly gone. I also understand the allure of simply hiring a lawyer in the hopes that you can just throw money at the problem and have someone else solve it for you while you go about your life. What do you really think a lawyer can accomplish in this situation? Do Mike's actions thus far make you think he will be responsive to threats of civil action, or that he has funds or property to go after, or even that he will one day have wages to garnish to cover the costs of the books and money he has stolen? CALL...THE...POLICE!!! Everyone whose books are missing should be filling a police report via telephone, and posting their police file number and the name of the assigned investigator in this thread. Every subsequent person who makes a complaint should ask for the same investigator, and ask that their complaint be cross referenced with the others. You should all be pushing for the police to execute search warrants at Mike's home and business to recover the outstanding books (which would be both evidence, proceeds of crime, and forfeitable/RETURNABLE property). If charges result (which they almost assuredly will) you should push the DA to advocate for financial restitution as part of sentencing. This will require work on your part. You will need to stay on top of law enforcement and advocate for yourself. But the more of you who band together, the more likely you will be successful. Even those of you who got your books back should be calling the police and telling them your story, particularly if you lost funds. In the end you PROBABLY won't get your books back. You DEFINITELY won't get your money back. But you can make sure Mike is held responsible for his actions.
  12. Bought a raw Neal Adams cover from Alex. Book shipped quickly, was REALLY well packed, and was accurately graded. Wouldn't hesitate to buy from him again. Thanks Alex!
  13. Late to the thread, but I found some actual behind the scene photos of CGC employees conducting the reholdering process:
  14. In custody? Linking my previous comment from this thread below for visibility. Those affected should reach out to law enforcement: https://boards.cgccomics.com/topic/529515-hero-restoration-anyone-know-the-latest/?do=findComment&comment=13067548 As an add-on to my previous comment, I would recommend calling law enforcement, rather than submitting an online form if at all possible. Individuals who take the time and make the effort to call will, rightly or wrongly, be taken more seriously and given priority over those who simply fill out a written complaint. Best of luck.