Long time lurker, first time poster. Thought it was about time I joined in with the shenanigans.
Now that we’re finally able to get out to bars again (albeit outside only at the minute), me and a friend I haven’t seen in a while met up for a couple of drinks and the topic quickly moved to comics and the insanity of the market over the past year with how much certain books have spiked in price etc.
Anyhow, a few pints later, and I can’t remember exactly how we got into the debate, but we were debating which book is a better investment - both short term and longer term. Both in the same grade (we opted to stick to the more moderate 9.4 NM’s rather than the 9.8s which can skew prices etc). Both slabbed by cgc. Both first print standard non newsstand covers.
His view was clone wars #1 all day long. Much less of them out there, no where near its peak given no tano show yet. Much more room grow. Star Wars stuff will extend beyond comic fans into pop culture fandom etc.
I on the other hand thought ASM #300 was the better book to own and/or invest in. Arguably introduced the best “new” comic character from the past 30 years, the fact spidey’s rogue gallery is amongst the very best (bar maybe Batman’s), the iconic nature of the cover, the fact there still is room to grow, the McFarlane factor, the track record of ASM titles etc. I just felt this was the smarter and safer option.
Anyways, our discussion ended in an impasse and switched to other topics of the day (Covid, football, movies) but on my way home, I began to think he was right so was he?
All things being equal (grade, case etc), is clone wars #1 a better investment than asm #300?
Btw, thanks to you all for hours of hilarity, insight and more over the past year especially - from “Friday” posts to books heating up - it seems a great community and glad to have plucked up (maybe with the help of a few pints!) the courage to start posting!
Cheers 🍻