• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Have you ever.....

Started by GACollectibles,

104 posts in this topic

greggy

greggy

Posted
Posted

PM Sean Harmon after another devastating Notre Dame loss?

 

PM Sean Harmon to sell an undercopy of a DC #1 that no one wants except him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pirate

Pirate

Posted
Posted
PM Sean Harmon after another devastating Notre Dame loss?

 

PM Sean Harmon to sell an undercopy of a DC #1 that no one wants except him?

 

I think ND could beat that sorry excuse for a pro team BC has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
VintageComics

VintageComics

Posted
Posted
been in before the lock?

 

:whee:

 

I'm pleased to say that I cause little controversy to the boards and usually go by unnoticed.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jeffro.

Jeffro.

Posted
Posted
been in before the lock?

 

:whee:

 

I'm pleased to say that I cause little controversy to the boards and usually go by unnoticed.

 

 

It's true folks. Been flying under the radar since 5/16/04

 

Hi guys. Been up reading this thread for a while. I'm new so take it easy :-) I have a few points of view to offer on the CGG/CGC discussion.

1st, consider the fact that CGG's business model is really no one's business except their's. Correct? Why kick someone in the arse when they are already trying to get up. If you want to be constructive do the RIGHT thing and contact them personally with corrective critisicm, I have had numerous issues with CGC but spoke directly to them about it instead of posting it to the world. That's the right thing to do.

2nd, is the fact that CGC makes mistakes going to go unchecked? With big $$, an army of employees, financial backing that could run the US military (well sort of) blah blah blah there should be no room for error. And yet they happen. I have had my more than fair share, and you have only mentioned one or two.

3rd, if the PVC problem is "officially" not a problem, why not offer a retraction or apology for damaging their credit?

4th, if their books are getting undergraded, does this not provide a FANTASTIC service to the buyer of CGG graded books? I would then rather buy a 9.4 from CGG than from CGC, as the book is probably a nicer copy! From a collector's point of view, this is the way to go.

5th, I have used both companies and will continue to do so. Each has it's benefits. Most people that do not use CGC, have done so because of the wait. I would gladly have my books back in 3 weeks (even if late), then 2-4 months.

Competition is healthy, but let's be fair.

 

QUI VERITAS?

 

Sorry Roy. :foryou: Just struck me as funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
seanfingh

seanfingh

Posted
Posted
been in before the lock?

 

:whee:

 

I'm pleased to say that I cause little controversy to the boards and usually go by unnoticed.

 

 

It's true folks. Been flying under the radar since 5/16/04

 

Hi guys. Been up reading this thread for a while. I'm new so take it easy :-) I have a few points of view to offer on the CGG/CGC discussion.

1st, consider the fact that CGG's business model is really no one's business except their's. Correct? Why kick someone in the arse when they are already trying to get up. If you want to be constructive do the RIGHT thing and contact them personally with corrective critisicm, I have had numerous issues with CGC but spoke directly to them about it instead of posting it to the world. That's the right thing to do.

2nd, is the fact that CGC makes mistakes going to go unchecked? With big $$, an army of employees, financial backing that could run the US military (well sort of) blah blah blah there should be no room for error. And yet they happen. I have had my more than fair share, and you have only mentioned one or two.

3rd, if the PVC problem is "officially" not a problem, why not offer a retraction or apology for damaging their credit?

4th, if their books are getting undergraded, does this not provide a FANTASTIC service to the buyer of CGG graded books? I would then rather buy a 9.4 from CGG than from CGC, as the book is probably a nicer copy! From a collector's point of view, this is the way to go.

5th, I have used both companies and will continue to do so. Each has it's benefits. Most people that do not use CGC, have done so because of the wait. I would gladly have my books back in 3 weeks (even if late), then 2-4 months.

Competition is healthy, but let's be fair.

 

QUI VERITAS?

 

Sorry Roy. :foryou: Just struck me as funny.

 

:roflmao: Sorry, that just struck me as hilarious

Link to comment
Share on other sites
VintageComics

VintageComics

Posted
Posted

Gawd I was a newb then.

 

I was using CGG/PGA/PGX for grading at the time and couldn't understand why people didn't really like them.

 

:blush:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
seanfingh

seanfingh

Posted
Posted
Gawd I was a newb then.

 

I was using CGG/PGA/PGX for grading at the time and couldn't understand why people didn't really like them.

 

:blush:

 

If you ever get banned, I will smoke out your shill in 10 nanoseconds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Go to topic listing