PGM Ghost Rider #1 (1950)

[pickycollector]

 

[marvelcollector]

7.5-8.0...leaning toward the lower grade...BC brings it down...

[rjpb]

7.0/7.5

[MR SigS]

Holy spoon that front cover has bright colors

I'm betting the BC looks worse in the scan than it does in hand.

7.0

Maybe 7.5 if it looks WAY better in hand.

[Vision75]

8.0 to 8.5 is my impression. If the dirt was cleaned from the BC, perhaps a 9.2. Nice looking book. Dirty back covers are a tough call with GA. Definigely not as penalized as newer books in my experience.

[Johnny545]

7.0 as is higher with a press

[vaillant]

A pity for that dirt… it is a great copy.

I agree with Mr. Sig-S: 7.0/7.5.

[BarryAllen]

7.0

[Crimebuster]

8.0

 

quite a range on this one we have going I guess. Front cover is fantastic, back is obviously the issue. Not sure if that's staining in the bottom left corner or dirt.

[Lost]

8.0/8.5 with a cleaned up back

[The-Collector]

8.0 to 8.5 is my impression. If the dirt was cleaned from the BC, perhaps a 9.2. Nice looking book. Dirty back covers are a tough call with GA. Definigely not as penalized as newer books in my experience.

 

I dont think 9.2 is going to happen. Some of the marks on the BC are stains not dirt.

[The-Collector]

With the BC 7.0/7.5.

[pickycollector]

8.0/8.5 with a cleaned up back

but that would be restoration then, isn't it ?

[joeypost]

8.0

 

quite a range on this one we have going I guess. Front cover is fantastic, back is obviously the issue. Not sure if that's staining in the bottom left corner or dirt.

 

Looks like a crease or at least a raised area due to an impact. I see some remnants of a bend on the corner of the front cover.

 

As is a 7.0. It does have a little room for improvement.