PGM Tec 225

[Noble Nostalgia aka Nikelspot]

Thanks for looking. I am wanting to get opions on this book. Everything is attached and complete no restoration that I can detect. That is a big stain on the bottom left front cover and there are some other stains.

 

Scans and pics below.

 

Thank you in advance for your time

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[timfinz]

That's a lot of staining. I'd have to say 2.5.

[Artboy99]

That's a lot of staining. I'd have to say 2.5.

 

agreed

[rjpb]

2.0

[jsilverjanet]

2.5

[southerncross]

I'm at 2.5 with the staining. And there is water marks on the back cover. And the general wear, and a small sine split at the top of the spine. Great photos to grade from.

[divad]

2.0, possible 2.5

[DR.X]

2.0

 

Just the accumulation of too many things going on the F.C. for me to go higher. Theres quite a bit of staining but also the long creases and the color loss on that bottom corner. Could hit a 2.5 onsite.

[ROBTOTHEC]

Looks like a mess of a 2.0 to me.

Nice mess at that.

[jsilverjanet]

If that stain wasn't there, would it be higher than a 2.5?

[ROBTOTHEC]

If that stain wasn't there, would it be higher than a 2.5?

highly doubtful and there is way too much wear and that color loss on the

bottom left and all that water staining kill it. I could easily see this being 1.8 as is.

[Noble Nostalgia aka Nikelspot]

Thanks everyone. Yeah, I had it at 2.5 with a shot at 3.0 with a press, taking into consideration how CGC grades early 50's books. This book actually has a lot of good qualities that are often missing on this book.