PGM - EARTH'S MIGHTIEST SUPER-HEROES AKA AVENGERS 1

[jsilverjanet]

Please let me know your thoughts. Provided interior pics to see quality of book. The cover and centerfold are both perfectly attached. spine roll on the book, obvious chipping, missing parts of the book on the cover, near spine etc

 

Great color on the book

 

 

[Nino_013]

Dunno about the grade, but that's a sweet book bud. Congrats on the pick up!

[Cimm]

2.5

[timfinz]

2.0 IMHO I might have gone higher but there were too many "missing" pieces for me. But hey nice snag Hector! (thumbs u

[oakman29]

2.5

[ROBTOTHEC]

Looks like a textbook 2.0 to me.

[southerncross]

1.5, I had a copy graded that did not have pieces missing that was roughly in this condition. Maybe a 1.8. Cover still has eye appeal which is the most important thing. Nice pick up. (thumbs u

[divad]

1.5, I had a copy graded that did not have pieces missing that was roughly in this condition. Maybe a 1.8. Cover still has eye appeal which is the most important thing. Nice pick up. (thumbs u

 

What he said. 1.5 (Maybe a 1.8, but no higher).

[MR SigS]

1.8

2.0 on a good day.

[johnny54321]

solid textbook 2.0 imo, not strong or weak for the grade.

[jsilverjanet]

1.8

2.0 on a good day.

 

I'll make sure to submit it on my bday!

[southerncross]

Here is a book for a comparison. Sent this under copy in to CGC 5 years ago and it came back blue label 1.5 cream\off white. Green felt pen scribble on cover, wear along top and spine. no pieces missing on cover or interior of the book.

[johnny54321]

southerncross, if there are no hidden major defects, that has got to be the best 1.5 I have ever seen. That looks as good or better than my Avengers 1 CGC 3.0.

[southerncross]

Well this book sits in a 1.5 holder

[jsilverjanet]

not sure what's going on in the middle of the spine, but I think "5 years ago" was a very different grading system.You might get a higher score today. I agree I've seen worse 1.5s than the one in your pic