• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Savage Tales Club
2 2

40 posts in this topic

On 2/13/2022 at 11:18 AM, Rune said:

Does seem like something just .... happened hm 

123.thumb.jpg.5170a9496ccfc500fb3b537623008ae5.jpg

This might be my favorite mag. I do remember getting my first ST #1 9.6 mag - from a dude in Canada. It was a true treasure - back then I was kinda ecstatic getting that book. Of course it was not similar to holding my firstborn son for the first time, or was it? lol :facepalm:  

At 9.6 these mags are selling for 5k now - and 2k for 9.0. They grow up so fast... 

I hope you naturally let your little boy grow up and mature at the normal rate-not the steroid manipulated rate represented by auctions like these. :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/8/2021 at 12:11 PM, Rune said:

Got a few mags too...

ty.thumb.png.88a57de5fc37137b7997c07980db5d9f.png

https://comics.www.collectors-society.com/registry/comics/PeopleSetDetail.aspx?PeopleSetID=34657

https://www.myslabbedcomics.com/GalleryRoom.asp?GSub=2548

120620121183.thumb.JPG.4a467fff6f47a70bf71aa707d27b70d4.JPG

- picked up some original art too:

MrlmNTCP_2410151133271.thumb.jpg.a1e0785eb2d5d652f21a463aa6b84d00.jpg

My favorite oa of the few covers I own, I never get tired of looking at it, Barr used some amazing colors and provided great details - like:

84r5y5PZ_3101160337531.thumb.jpg.1c41206bc778900eb2881847fb2def83.jpg

(worship)(worship)(worship)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/18/2022 at 1:40 PM, Rune said:

Can this be a 9.8 with that top staple wearing almost through the cover? Considered a production flaw I guess?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/20/2022 at 9:25 AM, Rune said:

I would not consider it a flaw, pretty sure CGC doesn't either - it's just how these mags were made. 

Then we disagree. As when this mag originally came out of production, that staple though raised slightly, certainly did not produce the amount of wear and color loss that appears now. That can only happen from weight and friction. Maybe a result from a press? Still a beautiful book don’t get me wrong, just questioning the defect in the 9.8 realm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/20/2022 at 4:22 PM, Jayman said:

Then we disagree. As when this mag originally came out of production, that staple though raised slightly, certainly did not produce the amount of wear and color loss that appears now. That can only happen from weight and friction. Maybe a result from a press? Still a beautiful book don’t get me wrong, just questioning the defect in the 9.8 realm.

 

There may be many things to consider buying a new mag like this - if you're able to find one - personally I like if the cover isn't too misaligned (thus horizontal lines across the cover should be horizontal, not going up or down), and the red ink should pop to some degree (indicating that the cover hasn't been exposed to too much light) and I like sharp corners with no visible defects - and I like a clean white back. 

Once I did monitor new ST #1 9.8 mags - but gave up some years ago. I still have these images - as you can see, 1055066001 was graded some time ago (April 4 2011) and still looks much the same:

 

0079322004

486777371_0079322004FOW-W.thumb.jpg.ec332c84d3f60bd9c7f2b9961c310df0.jpg

1683593697_lf(4).thumb.jpg.aa13898e2cb218d4a0c9504bd79638b8.jpg

 

0085606011

1246879022_0085606011FWP.thumb.jpg.a64350e6ab35180982f852509c4e16e5.jpg

725656870_0085606011BWP.thumb.jpg.bbc8203f924b38e1b7df21bb9a7e47b8.jpg

 

0341165001

20566079_s-l1600(1).thumb.jpg.ec976df9cccb495fec19b3beb448ad14.jpg

380115797_s-l1600(3).thumb.jpg.b01d2c7c68f4aad1e7f1e2779d464816.jpg

s-l1600.thumb.jpg.f4930e665cadb4150cbddddfd810c6df.jpg

 

0719351001 (My mag)

1911831114_0719351001FOW-W.JPG.8e7198702d4db4e18d983928189ac079.JPG

120620121181.thumb.JPG.51a1efa390845337078e63f4adbb9c2f.JPG

0719351001B.thumb.JPG.58981df266289a1ddd0489d43d155e9a.JPG

 

0719351006

48408873_0719351006FOW-W.thumb.jpg.c852c094c4705351403d26c152b6f2df.jpg

1444041676_0719351006FOW-W(2).thumb.jpg.85fd69d2b66842cc6daaafd84642fc7f.jpg

1398823496_0719351006BOW-W.thumb.jpg.af8460a7516e0c483344721cf1a02a0a.jpg

 

1005796001:

1112203183_1005796001FWP.jpg.3d1eec6efc6ad437ae80386ce4ce333e.jpg

 

1055066001 (on CLink now, image taken in 2011 - 2012, been on my hard-drive at least since May 2012):

1033654566_1055066001FWP.JPG.d9e9252e411899f6f3e303667649516d.JPG

The new image on CLink for comparison:

65502930_50000920098000001055066001(1).thumb.jpg.94782308c196bb85a22484a61700f372.jpg

RAD923632022215_12922.thumb.jpg.be05c781fc69bd93e7761dabac7654df.jpg

 

1261133001

1217719866_1261133001FOW-W.jpg.c2c09c1b5ce6a2f0320d318e5b39aa51.jpg

 

3861224003

711395286_lf(2).thumb.jpg.82fbec3e44e21dfe0f7ee6675ca73a3c.jpg

179736888_lf(3).thumb.jpg.20185375304e3cce433044127f9e12aa.jpg

Edited by Rune
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/20/2022 at 5:54 PM, Jayman said:

I have to say your copy looks so much nicer than the copy with the staple indent and wear! (thumbsu

 

Thanks, my favorite might be 0719351006 - and the one selling on HA a few months ago (3861224003). Then again, some may have flaws hard to see on low-res photos, and of course none were graded 9.9... 

EDIT: Just added the HA mag to my previous post :-) 

Edited by Rune
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
2 2