• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

CC Auction 11/22/2021
2 2

53 posts in this topic

On 11/25/2021 at 11:01 AM, Robot Man said:

To tell the truth, most GA superhero books get a little boring and formula. As far as DC goes, the early Spectre, Dr. Fate, Sandman and Batman stories are quite fun.

As far as other publishers go, EC, Barks ducks and the Spirit by Eisner are standouts. Sad that a lot of them have fallen behind. These have both great art and stories. 

The Spirit was a newspaper strip! And yes, the EC stories were quite good; I've read most of the sci-fi and horror stories in reprints. (The sci-fi stories were actually a little better than the horror stories.)

 

Edited by jimbo_7071
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/25/2021 at 8:34 AM, jimbo_7071 said:

The Spirit was a newspaper strip! And yes, the EC stories were quite good; I've read most of the sci-fi and horror stories in reprints. (The sci-fi stories were actually a little better than the horror stories.)

 

The Spirit was also a 22 issue comic book run. Although, the newspaper strip inserts are a bit of a better read. It also ran for about 12 years and was quality from start to end. 

As far as ECs go, my personal preference for a great read are the war titles. Very different than their competitors as they were often very anti war. Incredible attention to detail in the art as well. Very historically accurate. I can't tell you how many times I've read the short Aces High run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/25/2021 at 11:50 AM, Robot Man said:

The Spirit was also a 22 issue comic book run. Although, the newspaper strip inserts are a bit of a better read. It also ran for about 12 years and was quality from start to end. 

As far as ECs go, my personal preference for a great read are the war titles. Very different than their competitors as they were often very anti war. Incredible attention to detail in the art as well. Very historically accurate. I can't tell you how many times I've read the short Aces High run.

I've never read any of the war stories, so I'll have to check them out.

I have to admit that Al Feldstein is a bit of an enigma to me. Judging from the E.C. stories while he was editor, he must have been very progressive, yet some of his pre-E.C. covers seem to have depicted women as sex objects. Maybe women's issues hadn't come to the fore yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/25/2021 at 1:08 PM, jimbo_7071 said:

I've never read any of the war stories, so I'll have to check them out.

I have to admit that Al Feldstein is a bit of an enigma to me. Judging from the E.C. stories while he was editor, he must have been very progressive, yet some of his pre-E.C. covers seem to have depicted women as sex objects. Maybe women's issues hadn't come to the fore yet.

"Some"? All of Feldstein's covers for both Fox and EC (that portray women) depict them as sex objects, don't they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or maybe he was just doing his job and creating covers that sold to 12 year old boys?   

When Fabio was depicted shirtless on Harlequin romances, did you sit around wondering why the publishing house wasn't more progressive?

When you read Pride and Prejudice and Elizabeth tries to decide between Bingley (very wealthy) and Darcy (twice as wealthy) did you wonder why Bronte was so materialistic?

Female lead characters in books (comic or otherwise) are usually pretty.    Male lead characters are usually either wealthy or heroic or both.    They are written and/or drawn to be attractive to the audience.

How many books or comics about awkward, physically stunted and desperately poor men trying to win the hand of really unattractive women have you read?   How many movies like that have you seen?

Edited by Bronty
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/25/2021 at 4:44 PM, Bronty said:

Or maybe he was just doing his job and creating covers that sold to 12 year old boys?   

When Fabio was depicted shirtless on Harlequin romances, did you sit around wondering why the publishing house wasn't more progressive?

When you read Pride and Prejudice and Elizabeth tries to decide between Bingley (very wealthy) and Darcy (twice as wealthy) did you wonder why Bronte was so materialistic?

Female lead characters in books (comic or otherwise) are usually pretty.    Male lead characters are usually either wealthy or heroic or both.    They are written and/or drawn to be attractive to the audience.

How many books or comics about awkward, physically stunted and desperately poor men trying to win the hand of really unattractive women have you read?   How many movies like that have you seen?

That's why R.Crumb created underground comics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/25/2021 at 2:44 PM, Bronty said:

Or maybe he was just doing his job and creating covers that sold to 12 year old boys?   

When Fabio was depicted shirtless on Harlequin romances, did you sit around wondering why the publishing house wasn't more progressive?

When you read Pride and Prejudice and Elizabeth tries to decide between Bingley (very wealthy) and Darcy (twice as wealthy) did you wonder why Bronte was so materialistic?

Female lead characters in books (comic or otherwise) are usually pretty.    Male lead characters are usually either wealthy or heroic or both.    They are written and/or drawn to be attractive to the audience.

How many books or comics about awkward, physically stunted and desperately poor men trying to win the hand of really unattractive women have you read?   How many movies like that have you seen?

so you're saying there is an untapped market out there hm

Edited by batman_fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/25/2021 at 3:44 PM, Bronty said:

Or maybe he was just doing his job and creating covers that sold to 12 year old boys?   

When Fabio was depicted shirtless on Harlequin romances, did you sit around wondering why the publishing house wasn't more progressive?

When you read Pride and Prejudice and Elizabeth tries to decide between Bingley (very wealthy) and Darcy (twice as wealthy) did you wonder why Bronte was so materialistic?

Female lead characters in books (comic or otherwise) are usually pretty.    Male lead characters are usually either wealthy or heroic or both.    They are written and/or drawn to be attractive to the audience.

How many books or comics about awkward, physically stunted and desperately poor men trying to win the hand of really unattractive women have you read?   How many movies like that have you seen?

Not sure if this was replying to my post, but personally, I have no problem with Feldstein's women. :nyah:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/25/2021 at 5:14 PM, batman_fan said:

I think I found our 1st story

bad-couples-photos.png

IT WILL SELL MILLIONS!!

 

Although even that pic.. of "ugly" people... there's nothing wrong with either of those two that a better haircut, losing the glasses, and some decent clothes wouldn't fix. 

Imagine putting actually ugly people on the cover lol    Print run:  negative 6.

Edited by Bronty
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/25/2021 at 3:16 PM, Bronty said:

IT WILL SELL MILLIONS!!

 

Although even that pic.. of "ugly" people... there's nothing wrong with either of those two that a better haircut, losing the glasses, and some decent clothes wouldn't fix. 

Imagine putting actually ugly people on the cover lol    Print run:  negative 6.

Fact check: True.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/25/2021 at 4:44 PM, Bronty said:

Or maybe he was just doing his job and creating covers that sold to 12 year old boys?   

When Fabio was depicted shirtless on Harlequin romances, did you sit around wondering why the publishing house wasn't more progressive?

When you read Pride and Prejudice and Elizabeth tries to decide between Bingley (very wealthy) and Darcy (twice as wealthy) did you wonder why Bronte was so materialistic?

Female lead characters in books (comic or otherwise) are usually pretty.    Male lead characters are usually either wealthy or heroic or both.    They are written and/or drawn to be attractive to the audience.

How many books or comics about awkward, physically stunted and desperately poor men trying to win the hand of really unattractive women have you read?   How many movies like that have you seen?

Attractive doesn't have to equal hypersexualized and objectified. Baker's women were drawn as attractive but naturalistic in a way that does not seem disrespectful or dehumanizing. I can't say the same about Feldstein's women.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/25/2021 at 9:33 PM, jimbo_7071 said:

Attractive doesn't have to equal hypersexualized and objectified. Baker's women were drawn as attractive but naturalistic in a way that does not seem disrespectful or dehumanizing. I can't say the same about Feldstein's women.

Again, target audience - young boys. 
 

I’m glad you brought up Baker.   Who do you think the target audience for Baker’s romance books was?   Boys or girls?   Any surprise the girls are drawn with a softer touch?

Now how about archies?   Those appealed to both genders and not surprisingly, the girls are depicted somewhere in between the two previous examples, yes?
 

They were looking to sell books and I have no doubt that the content and therefore audience for a given title influenced how BOTH sexes were depicted.    I’m sure the men in Baker romance books were a little more debonair and the men in the boy titles a little more physically aggressive .   A little more action hero and a little less handsome gentleman.    
 

This stuff is self evident and all around you if you look a little more openly and honestly.    You seem so eager to have no bias that you appear to have a bias in the other direction.    This was a business first and foremost. 
 

 

Edited by Bronty
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To illustrate.   This is the first war comic (I dare say vastly male readership) and first romance comic (vastly female readership) I found after this thread.   I didn’t dig for perfect examples -  just used the first ones I saw.
 

The War comic, the “boy” comic,  has action heroes fighting for life or death and lots of female leg.      The romance comic or “girl” comic has a handsome gent in a suit with girl next door types.   All dialogue , no action (apart from the necking).  
 

The publishers and artists knew exactly what they were doing in portraying both sexes for both sets of readers, and that’s fine.   Both genders got to read what appealed to them, so let’s not lay any fault at poor Mr Feldstein’s feet.   He had a job and did it well.   

5B9D18E8-A530-4306-A795-F982B3130616.png

9171ECD8-C8A7-4F6F-8581-48C6C6E0FD41.png

Edited by Bronty
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/25/2021 at 2:00 PM, comicnoir said:

That's why R.Crumb created underground comics.

I think Crumb’s work was autobiographical and done for his own fantasies. UGs wern’t done for 12 year old boys. They were specifically for older audiences and clearly marketed as such. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
2 2