Time for guess the CGC grade

[-cryptkeeper-]

CGC 7.0

[jeffb]

With all due respect to the long-time Overstreet "low distribution" hype of this issue

 

Educate me about this?

[jeffb]

Wow, I was going to say 8.0 with that heavy tear at the corner. But maybe it is worse than it looks? 7.0 FN/VF seems quite harsh for that book. I'd surely pay FN/VF prices for it

 

-bounty

 

I paid $70 shipped but most likely be selling it.

[-cryptkeeper-]

Wow, I was going to say 8.0 with that heavy tear at the corner. But maybe it is worse than it looks? 7.0 FN/VF seems quite harsh for that book. I'd surely pay FN/VF prices for it

 

-bounty

 

I paid $70 shipped but most likely be selling it.

 

[divad]

With all due respect to the long-time Overstreet "low distribution" hype of this issue

 

Educate me about this?

 

If I recollect correctly, Overstreet notes for this issue, "Low Distribution - Scarce in High-Grade". These notes, although historic, have proven to be incorrect (See e.g., Conan #3).

[Pirate]

Drum roll . . . . . and the answer is

 

 

I was closest, you can all kiss it

 

** pirate 2006 closest grader of the year *

 

Seriously if it's a valuable book i would resub it or get the grader notes and find out why it got a 7.0

 

now these comments are pretty funny.................

 

3 other folks have the SAME guess as you (and Aces is the only person to even hint at the book being in the 7 category), and you're taking credit for being the closest.......

 

they are all my followers

[burntboy]

Drum roll . . . . . and the answer is

 

 

I was closest, you can all kiss it

 

** pirate 2006 closest grader of the year *

 

Seriously if it's a valuable book i would resub it or get the grader notes and find out why it got a 7.0

 

now these comments are pretty funny.................

 

3 other folks have the SAME guess as you (and Aces is the only person to even hint at the book being in the 7 category), and you're taking credit for being the closest.......

 

they are all my followers

 

[KingOfRulers]

cgc 9.0

 

 

...why would that be a 7.0? For that matter why would this go under 8.5???

[CW]

Guess the tear is worse than I thought. Missed that one pretty bad.

[Aces]

Drum roll . . . . . and the answer is

 

 

I was closest, you can all kiss it

 

** pirate 2006 closest grader of the year *

 

Seriously if it's a valuable book i would resub it or get the grader notes and find out why it got a 7.0

 

now these comments are pretty funny.................

 

3 other folks have the SAME guess as you (and Aces is the only person to even hint at the book being in the 7 category), and you're taking credit for being the closest.......

[rjpb]

Drum roll . . . . . and the answer is

 

 

 

You were robbed! 7.0 seems to be those most wildly inconsistent grade CGC gives out. I've seen CGC 7.0s with so much fugly foxing they wouldn't rate higher than a 4.0 in my book, and others that look nicer than some 8.5s.