PGM: Aquaman 50

[Neurosis138]

Here's a pick-up from todays sacramento con:

 

 

Thanks,

-Chris

[Neurosis138]

Wow, that scan does not do this book justice. It looks so much whiter in person.

 

-Chris

[Crackandpresstoan11]

9.0.

[Pirate]

8.0 due to the spine, a few scuffs, spine nick/tear x2 above top staple, abraded spine. nice white book

[KingOfRulers]

9.0.

 

I agree

[seank]

I'd say 9.0ish. Nice looking book.

[Neurosis138]

8.0 due to the spine, a few scuffs, spine nick/tear x2 above top staple, abraded spine. nice white book

 

There are no tears on the spine. The only spine defect is a minor abbrassion in between the two staples, otherwise, it's near perfect. I'm still not sure why the scan looks so bad, I haven't had this trouble before.

 

-Chris

[jbud73]

I think ink transfer is making the spine look a lot worse than it probably is. Looks like the left corners are a bit soft, but I have a few slabbed 9.2s from this era and I don't see anything to dissuade me from calling this book a NM-

 

Nice pick up.

[buttock]

That book is impossible to assess from a scan. I've looked at dozens of them, and they never show true.

[divad]

8.0 due to the spine, a few scuffs, spine nick/tear x2 above top staple, abraded spine. nice white book

 

Those "scuffs" are actually ink drags = printing defect which probably appear on many copies of this issue (See similar "defect" on Amazing Adventures #11 and Marvel Team-Up #1)

[october]

9.0