PGM Marvel Double Feature #1

[richnerd]

 

 

[backtomarvel]

Stain on the URC of the back, some blunting in upper and lower left corners, what seems in the scan to be a general dullness on the cover ... 5.0

[divad]

Stain on the URC of the back, some blunting in upper and lower left corners, what seems in the scan to be a general dullness on the cover ... 5.0

 

[october]

Stain on the URC of the back, some blunting in upper and lower left corners, what seems in the scan to be a general dullness on the cover ... 5.0

 

 

You know, all these super strict graders never seem to be around when I am looking for books to buy. Must just be bad timing on my part.

 

6.0/6.5

[marvelcollector]

Without the stain it's a 6.5 - 7.0...with it 6.0-6.5...leaning toward lower grade...

[CJ]

stain, or whatever it is, hurst it

 

but its still a 6.5

[richnerd]

I can see the 6.0-6.5 but a 5.0

 

And I just looked into that stain a bit more and oh boy. Someone put a sticker on the inside and thats the glue bleeding through. The color of the cover is actually bright and book presents well. The back cover just blows it.

[seank]

My first impression was 6.0. Stain is bad. The book looks like it has a lot of general wear that doesn't translate well to grading definitions.

 

Actually, my first impression was "fine-ish," but CGC doesn't put that on its slabs.

[Susanville]

is it a stain or did a previous owner try to erase a set of initials? i've got a few books where someone tried to erase and it looks just like that...

[backtomarvel]

Stain on the URC of the back, some blunting in upper and lower left corners, what seems in the scan to be a general dullness on the cover ... 5.0

 

 

You know, all these super strict graders never seem to be around when I am looking for books to buy. Must just be bad timing on my part.

 

6.0/6.5

 

Your booth must be the one I come by that's selling overgraded/overpriced common books from the early 1970s.