PGM ASM #174

[JammnIT]

Concensus on this book?

 

[herald2galactus]

it seems to me that the the top of thr scan is cut off, other wise id say 6.5, due to what looks to be chipping along the right edge, apparant water stains, and a missing peice on the bottom back cover

[Dad&Son-migration]

There's no water stains on that book. A little dirty but that's about it, plus the scan is so large everything is magnified. That book gets no less then a 7.0 but I can't see the entire top edge of the front cover though.

[herald2galactus]

There's no water stains on that book. A little dirty but that's about it, plus the scan is so large everything is magnified. That book gets no less then a 7.0 but I can't see the entire top edge of the front cover though. [/quote

 

 

yeah thats why sed apparant, looked like water stains top right back, but maybe dirt

[Shadow]

Hard to tell with how large the scan is. I'd say better than a 6.5. Maybe a 7.5?

[aaron568]

i would say 6.5 also