A Discussion About How CGC Label Non-US Publications Which Reprint / Reproduce Original US Comic Content
Hello. What do we think of how CGC currently label 'foreign' publications - those intended for a non-US audience - which reprint original US comic content? Are they getting it right?
I saw these two examples in the 'Foreign' thread today:
The 'Spidey' is fairly OK. I don't like the word 'France' just hanging there on it's own, but the book is labelled in line with it's title, issue number, date and publisher. And it notes the original US comic content which the book reproduces. I
@Aman619 posted this comment over in my Marvel UKPV thread:
The database searching isn't really my number one issue, Aman. I disagree with the core principles that underpin the entire approach.
I appreciate that the announcement looks very slick, and that it will be enticing to many. That's a good thing, undoubtedly - bringing the books to wider attention and increasing awareness. But if the basic principles that underpin the labelling and recording approach are wrong, then it doesn'
