• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

bski80

Member
  • Posts

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by bski80

  1. while I agree that the submission takes time on the user end.   I think the amount of detail helps them save time in grading and gets us our cards back quicker.   The detail should help them find the correct card easily on speed up their process.  I have seen HGA and other companies where they screw up the card label and put wrong info on it.   

     

    and......... they have a simple answer for people who are too busy to do it.  $2 per card is very minimal is you don't have the time.

  2. 13 hours ago, tmoore_25 said:

    The above thoughts are correct. Remember who is heading the CSG grading division. A former higher level Beckett grader. CSG 9.5 will be the standard most comparable to a PSA 10. CSG 10 Pristine and Perfect will almost always sell for more than PSA 10 unless the PSA pop is extremely low, but also be much rarer, as it should be. CSG is very tough on card surface. I don't know what it is they are looking at or for but my last 19 card order came back with not a single 10 for surface. The only column where I did not get a single 10 at all. I have no idea what they are looking for as I sent in both paper and glossy chrome type cards. Out of the 19 cards, I only got 3 CSG 10's. In each case, the cards came back with all 10 subgrades except for surface.

    they must be looking far beyond 10x magnification on the surface. 

  3. you are just wiping them off with a microfiber cloth.   That isn't altering the card.  I have observed this being a must on newer cards and a good thing on many older cards.   Why would you leave a finger print or specs of dust on them to get a bad surface score?