dpiercy

OMG!

13 hours ago, natevegas said:

I liked the amusement park WD style exploration.  I'm a bit confused why Rosita thinks she can basically do anything when she failed the first time hardcore and people died because of it.  I'm enjoying these episodes but her attitude this season really is grinding my gears.

Yah, cool episode, but stupid idea to have Rosita and Tyreese's sister, Bernice, go after Negan.

9 minutes ago, fantastic_four said:

Did the comic explain why Wolverine was aging after they had previously established him as nearly immortal?

Not really, they just leave it to the imagination, that after hundreds of years, he does actually age, albeit much slower than regular people. I find this much more realistic than Wolverine being truly immortal, like a vampire or something.

6 minutes ago, fantastic_four said:

Yea, I'm stuck thinking about X-23.  And whether or not I hate the film's idea that Wolverine's adamantium was poisoning him.  I don't think I like that idea.

It does make sense, though. Logan's failing healing power added so much tension and drama.

I can't stop thinking about the movie!!! So aaaaaaawwwwweeeeesooooome!!!

Yes, the chemistry between Jackman/Keen/Stewart was palpable. Transcendent performances.

I am obsessed w/this movie now and plan to see it at least one more time. Dafne Keen was sooooooo good.

Just got back from seeing it again and loved it this time. What a performance by Dafne Keen as X23.

Thought it was just ok. Antagonists were generic. X24 = stupid. X23 was FANTASTIC, best part of the movie. 2nd half of the movie was better than the 1st. Fight scenes were great, but mean very little when the villains are so generic and blah.

Loved the 2 page spread in 165!

On 2/13/2017 at 5:20 PM, bigclutch said:

I'll gladly delete my post. Didn't want to cause any issues. 

 

-shawn

Please don't stop posting WD related Skybound stuff here!!! Shawn is awesome!

8 hours ago, FoggyNelson said:

The Wolverine best there is #1 is so cool!

Too bad it is one of the WORST books in the history of comics. Serious dung that title was.

Raw grading is stupid.

I thought it was largely disappointing. It is 25 minutes of story and then just gun fire the rest of the movie. The only new character that was mildly interesting was the deaf girl. Loved the 1st movie, this was ok, but nowhere near as interesting. 

Also thought it was solid. The armored zombie thing I thought was a little dumb, though it was executed well. They keep teasing w/Rick and his hand. I thought the leader lady was incredibly creepy.

Issue 164 is excellent! 

On 2/13/2017 at 7:16 PM, Pontoon said:

I'd say the target age was people of all ages. My 4th grader enjoyed it, the missus enjoyed it, younger kids in the audience enjoyed as did the adults I saw and heard, including myself.

Ok, but the music, and there was a lot of it,  was definitely targeting 4 & 5 year olds. New renditions of 80s pop hits sung by children. Arrrrrrgh...I didn't like it.

27 minutes ago, Batman said:

Probably a stupid question but is it suitable for a 4 year old to watch?

Yes, 4 to 5 year olds is the target audience, honestly.

Hated the music...really fun otherwise. Loved the handful of '66 references/visuals.

12 hours ago, My young Padawan said:

What did the red label indicate?

Inflammation.

I emailed asking about the different cases being used presently, there are 2 that I am aware of, and I was told there are "many different well designs" depending on the size of the comic. FYI

Kirkman is a huge fan of comics so I really don't see him abandoning the medium.