• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Qalyar

Member
  • Posts

    1,953
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Qalyar

  1. I don't want to threadcrap or anything, but thought I'd provide a little info on this weird thing. This isn't, strictly speaking, an issue of Bulletman (even though it uses the cover art from Bulletman #3). This is one of a loose series of miniature comics called "Mighty Midget Comics", published by Samuel E. Lowe. The interior reprints content from Bulletman #6 and #7 and from Master Comics #27 (and as I recall is only 30 pages despite what the cover says!). Lowe sold these cheap little reprint books originally for 2 for 5 cents! What's interesting about THIS copy is the shoe store ad on the back cover. I've seen this issue before, but always with a blank back cover (except for the war bonds bit). If there's someone into collecting Fawcett and related material who enjoys the chase for odd printings and variants, this one is for you!
  2. 1.0, because in my opinion, this is a 1.5 book that will lose another grade for the staining caused by adhesive migration from the tape. But beat up Daredevil 1 is still Daredevil 1!
  3. Quick comments on a few of these. Overall, I agree with the the folks who got to this thread before me. The only way you're losing money on this buy is if you light it on fire or otherwise mistreat these books. Great catch. Active Comics was a Bell publication, one of the Canadian White publishers. You have issues 29 and 30 (the latter titled on cover as New Active Comics). Technically, these last two issues are reprints of US material rather than newly published Canadian content, but they're still collected as part of the Canadian Whites, and 29 in particular is a really hard book to find. Despite the cover being detached at the lower staple, yours is actually in fairly decent condition for the title, a lot of these are straight-up beat. Crackajack Funnies 10 is a decent enough book, although the spine roll and ugly tear on yours are going to keep it down in the $20-25 range, I think, assuming no other problems. It's too bad that's not Crackajack Funnies 9, which is the first comic appearance of Red Ryder and a pretty solid minor key book even in trashy grades. Not that you aren't winning on this buy anyway! Your Jeep Comics 2 is quite scarce and rather odd. Only the UK edition has the cover character in blue; he is colored rather like a big flying baby in the US version. I have no idea how to assign a market value to this one. Guessing at condition, the US edition would probably be a $50ish book. British editions that vary only by price are often less desirable, but this is an actual variant cover in the true sense, and zero copies of it have been slabbed by CGC. Too bad about the top right corner, though. I have absolutely no idea what that Jet Comics even is. The text on the cover is a little too small for me to read in that pic, but it looks like it may have been some sort of promotional give-away? At the very least, you'll want to investigate that one further. Red Hot Comics 3 is another Canadian White by Bell, and this one isn't a reprint book, although ironically Red Hot is probably a less less, well, red hot than Active. Three Aces Comics 54 is another book to look at closely for condition. It's hard to tell the grade on these from the overview pics, but a CGC 5.0 copy sold last year for $240. World Famous Creatures 1 is a historically important horror magazine, debuting not long after Famous Monsters of Filmland. The UK edition, which yours is, only lasted for this one issue, and is not common. Unfortunately, in low grades, it's probably only a ~$30 book (although I imagine it would sell faster than a lot of stuff in that price range). Make sure the back cover is intact; at least the US editions were published with a cut-out monster mask on the back cover and, predictably, many copies have a big hole in the back cover as a result. Someone else will have to help you with those Classics Illustrated. That series is a nightmare of weirdness to determine printings on, and I have made it my life's goal never to deal with them if I don't have to. There are undoubtedly some experts around here. No clue if any of these titles are ones worth the trouble. Long Distance Wife is actually one of the 10 issues of Streamline Pictorial Romance, published by the British paperback publisher (and cheapo repackager of US comics) Streamline. This series reprinted stories from various Fox publications, mostly My Love Life and My Secret Story. I'm not sure which "number" this one is (and not all of them were even officially assigned numbers in the indicia, so they're sort of one-offs, but also not really). GCD only has a handful of images for them. This is 100% going to be an example of "not everything scarce has enough market to be worth money", I'm afraid, unless you get lucky and find someone who actually collects the (lots of) obscure romance stuff Streamline produced in the 50s.
  4. Agreed with a 6.0, probably with something like OW/Cream for PQ. This question is on my short list of warning signs that a return would be likely.
  5. To be honest, there's no shortage of banged-up modern books. Stuff damaged in shipping, shelved carelessly, or just actually read. We just don't see them posted here very often, due to the nature of the board. As for the grade, I'm also inclined to go 8.5 here, although with the FC UR crease, the crunched FC LR, and at least two color-breaking defects at BC bottom, there's a chance this might only bring an 8.0.
  6. That is absolutely the 1997 reprint and not the 1953 original. EDIT: FYI, these are really easy to tell apart. The original is somewhat wider than a modern comic book and has a lighter background color. But, far more obviously than that, it also has a 25 cent cover price, below the title at the right. The reprint was a pack-in with Superman Red/Superman Blue and so does not have a cover price.
  7. They've actually been doing this for a little while, at least. When they make an error regarding an order, or (as in your case), oversell their stock, they ship a "We Effed Up" edition, which are not otherwise available. This is at least the second such book. I know previously they shipped a We Effed Up edition of Lady Death Icon #1. I guess they Effed Up enough to exhaust that print run!
  8. Ouch. My only Lotus was Unlimited. And when I bailed on the game circa the end of the Urza Block, I did get all of TWENTY DOLLARS EACH for my beta dual lands...
  9. World's Finest did not often refer to the logic of its plot or writing
  10. Those sorts of miscuts used to be much more common, in the game's early days. Sometimes displaying almost half of each card. And sometimes only one mat was misaligned, so you'd get a reasonably centered card on the back, with something wacky on the front. I had some fun ones, long ago, but I sold off the whole collection ... sadly, not long before the secondary market really took off. Of course.
  11. They're self-published (as "Like a Virus Productions") comics written by Dallas-area author Ken Lowery, who is maybe better known for his presence on Twitter (among other things, as creator of the Fake AP Stylebook account that randomly acquired an awful lot of attention at one point). Lowery distributes most of his comics exclusively as digital publications on Comixology, but there are at least a few he's done physical print runs for, as far back as 2013. Offering (2016) is the older of these two, a sort of EC-horror tribute book, co-written and illustrated by Kevin Warren (probably best known as the artist for Copernicus Jones: Robot Detective). The Night Driver (2017) has art by Gavin Guidry and lettering done by Micah Myers. Lowery's comics are firmly modern indie stuff. I don't think the print runs were ever very large, but conversely, the market for them probably isn't either.
  12. Well, what I think is being mentioned here is the "Uncorrected proof advance readers copy" wordless variant sent as a 1/store promo to select retailers. However, those were created on purpose; they aren't errors like the Venom Lethal Protector books, the blue panel Sandman, the no-die-cut Tick, or the freaky chartreuse Spawn on the back cover of Malibu Sun 13 error copies.
  13. Ironically, with misprints, extreme rarity sometimes hurts value because it limits visibility and demand. There are lots and lots of one-off errors in comics. There are certainly collectors who enjoy them, and to those collectors, they may demand a premium. But it's tough to find a market for them. When a single error occurred on a slightly larger block of copies, you get things like the black Venom cover, or the blue panel Sandman, or similar comics. Then, there's enough copies to make it a viable collectible, and not just a unique aberration, and the value often reflects the rarity. These? No real idea.
  14. I don't think anyone other than Counterpoint has been doing these "fleck" covers. It would be... nice for this not to become a wider industry trend. Counterpoint, of course, will continue doing whatever gimmicks they can come up with to justify additional 10 comic print runs of new variants of the same half-dozen books. They get work from some great artists, but, well, I don't have a very healthy opinion of them as a publisher
  15. Would a press improve the grade? Perhaps, although it's virtually impossible to say anything from just the grader notes. CGC's grader notes are not standardized (and, indeed, not mandatory for the graders to provide). "Light bends" are pretty likely to be a pressable defect; spine stress is almost certainly not. "Light creasing" could go either way; just because the notes don't use the magic word "color-breaking", doesn't mean they are or aren't. Would a press be worth it in terms in cost-to-value? I doubt it. It's really tough to earn more than +0.5 on a press. But let's say you have press-friendly defects and a skilled presser and earn +1.0 grade adjustment via CPR. GoCollect reports that Marvel Super-Heroes 8 is a $55 book in an 8.0 slab, $70 at 7.5, and an $85 book in a 9.0 slab. CCS QuickPress plus regrading and shipping are already north of $30, and if you only get an 8.5 back, you've only gained +$15 on FMV.
  16. Wow, this company makes it hard to determine what they've printed. And their website is like 90s-Geocities-level useless. I think they release AP-numbered versions of anything they release in normally-numbered versions. So, yes, I believe that image #6 and #7 are not the same book. The one image certainly doesn't appear chrome at all. As for the non-chrome Bespin cover, yeah, I would suspect an AP print exists. Unless they numbered those as DF for some reason? For normal printing companies, "AP" means "artist's proof" (or "author's proof", for non-comic books). These are usually separately numbered issues held back for the use of the artist or author. There's lots of these sorts of things for Stephen King limited editions, for example. On the other hand, Counterpoint seems to print these just so there are more ultra-low-print-run variants. No idea how many there are, either. I'd guess runs of 10, insofar as I haven't found examples of a Counterpoint AP book with a double-digit number. But who knows? And zero clue what that DF version is or means. For everyone else in the comic world, DF is Dynamic Forces. But I don't have any evidence that Dynamic Forces has been involved with these Counterpoint books. So... Yeah. You might try reaching out to Counterpoint and seeing if they'll actually provide a list of what they've released. I've had mixed luck with that sort of request from other publishers (props to Top Cow, slops to Fantagraphics). But the worst that happens is you're right back where you are now.
  17. Usagi, after his introduction, eventually joined the TMNT universe (and appeared in both the 1987, 2003, and 2012 cartoon series). That's certainly helped boost the value of Albedo 2. Also, it's a tiny print run with a lot of copies in pretty grim shape, so high grade examples are things to chase. Something ludicrous, assuming such a thing exists. Odds are pretty good at this point that there simply are no 9.8s of Cerebus 1. Most copies were marred by fairly significant production defects; Dave Sim held back essentially all legitimately high-grade copies and distributed them later through various means. Many of those are now SS books. If there was a 9.8 candidate Cerebus 1, we'd almost certainly have seen it by now. I don't believe Sim has a stash still held back, and normal distribution copies have pretty much zero shot at high grades.
  18. In general, one of the early anthropomorphic animal (that is, "furry") comics. But as far as the sky-high prices go? First appearance of Usagi Yojimbo.
  19. Well, you're my hero. It's... weird that the only privately sponsored versions recorded are from three newspapers in Texas. I really do wonder if there's undiscovered stuff out there somewhere. And I'm guessing that some of those later printings are distinguished only by the indicia because I don't see any cover differences between the 92/94/95 printings or between the 99/00 ones. Still, that's a pretty solid list of things to hunt for. Short answer: mostly, no. There is very little market history on these, because absolutely no one cares. The direct market version, when it has sold at all, looks to go for about the cost of slabbing, even in 9.8. There have been a couple higher dollar value sales for the mail-away variant (including a $200+ sale that I'm pretty sure must have been on crack), but I honestly wouldn't consider it to be worth that consistently. None of the rest have any real market history. Some of these are probably extremely hard to track down in high grade (and some of my reference pieces are, um, not high-grade books).
  20. No, but pre-Spiderman Peter Parker was molested by his skeevy neighbor. Bet you didn't know that was part of the Marvel canon! And, no, still hunting for that Babylon 5 DVD pack-in. Did finally snag myself a copy of Echo Echo, though, so making progress on weird niche items that no one else wants!
  21. Honestly -- and regrettably -- Stan Lee's signature was so variable, and there is so much volume, both real and fake, that determining the authenticity of any given instance, especially without provenance, is basically the same as reading tea leaves for divination.
  22. "Echo Echo: Cut-Up Drawings from Black Hole" (Pigeon Press, 2012) is essentially the sketchbook companion to Black Hole. This is the standard edition, a limited run of 400 copies, as opposed to the deluxe edition of 100, each with an original sketch by Burns tipped in (I don't collect original art, so I'm quite happy with this one).
  23. The cost of print comics is a problem for the industry, no question. It has, to be fair, probably only kept pace with all printing costs. MSRP for paperback novels are averaging in the $15 range these days... so in comparison, a $4 comic seems reasonable. But it isn't reasonable. Kids trying to buy into comics-for-kids don't have the cash flow that paperback readers might be expected to have. But more critically, books are easy to get for well under MSRP. Sure, maybe they're used, but they're readable. A paperback can take a lot more abuse than a comic book. And those used paperbacks are often $3... 4... 5 dollars. Now, a paperback doesn't have the rich illustrations of the comic book page, but it's also a lot more entertainment time for the money. I'm sure that comics are priced like they are because of the rising costs of printing, but it's still a challenge. And I don't know that it's one with a quick or easy answer; it certainly is one reason why digital releases must seem awfully tempting.
  24. I may shortly acquire a slab whose label is not strictly correct, but that isn't actually an error on CGC's part. Specifically, it notes that "two covers exist"; subsequently, CGC has agreed that those covers should be identified separately for census/registry purposes. What process should be used to correct this? Would I submit it for a standard reholder (presumably including a note about the update required)? Is the cost the same as a reholder requested for other reasons? Can this be submitted along with other, more normal reholder requests without incurring any problems?