PGM Astonishing Tales 25 (1st Deathlock)

[MODOK]

This copy will be placed on eBay in the next week or so.

 

Thanks in advance to all those who take the time to respond.

 

 

 

 

 

[The-Collector]

9.4. Can only see two spine ticks and some slight discoloration on the bc trc.

[etanick]

yuuuuup

[MODOK]

Thanks, guys! Some lucky person will be the proud new owner of this by the end of this month! (thumbs u

[Hado]

9.0/9.2 what's going on above the top staple?

[Passport Comics]

9.2, spine nicks and appears to be a little wear above top staple.

[Comicdey]

Bottom corner rounding. A few spine tics and slight color abrasions. I'd say CGC 9.2

 

Nice book

[vaillant]

I would play safely and say VF/NM 9.0, but of course it can be NM- 9.2.

Above that' I am out, wouldn’t know how to grade, unless I see a truly "perfect" copy.

[MR SigS]

3 noticeable spine tics, what I'm assuming is staple stress on top, 2 small color flecks on the right edge in the dark color, just before it goes into the light blue, possible scuffing on the FC spine about 2/3 down, blunted bottom left corner with abrasion, color flecks about 1/2" from the bottom left corner, what looks like slight foxing on the back bottom edge and a VERY light shadow on the back top right corner.

 

9.0 mostly due to the foxing.

[etanick]

yup, I missed that area at the top staple the first time around. Perhaps Modok can take a pic of that area close up.

[Hado]

yup, I missed that area at the top staple the first time around. Perhaps Modok can take a pic of that area close up.

You're lucky this book has no bubbles

[etanick]

thank God!

[ARK]

9.0 with the top staple problems and foxing.

[oakman29]

8.5/9.0

[The-Collector]

You guys are harsh!

[The-Collector]

Also I didn't look hard enough before grading.

[oakman29]

You guys are harsh!

I call it honest,and sometimes when people are emotionally attached to a book they don't think unbiased.

[The-Collector]

Yeah. I think the standard of the forum is not congruent with cgc though. The last book I posted here and then had graded, the concensus from the forum was 9.2. It came back a 9.6. People were spotting defects that the book did not have.

 

On this one I did miss quite a few defects so I would grade down.

[ROBTOTHEC]

Probably a 9.0.

[MR SigS]

Yeah. I think the standard of the forum is not congruent with cgc though. The last book I posted here and then had graded, the concensus from the forum was 9.2. It came back a 9.6. People were spotting defects that the book did not have.

 

On this one I did miss quite a few defects so I would grade down.

 

Link?