Way to confirm sig/artwork without needing a witness

[yoddler]

Instead of signing they could lick the cover.

[kav]

no you need that thumbprint cause someone could swipe their DNA paper

[jcjames]

Artists could use DNA authenticated paper

Include a DNA sample with each signing - hair, blood..... or other bodily fluid.

 

 

[kav]

Right published OA is a no brainer I was thinking of con sketches sketch covers and other art not published.

[kpaqu1]

They should sign in blood so I can own their souls.

[rtecbot]

Imprint their face on the paper then you'd have Shroud of artist

[Thawk]

I prefer to duct tape the entire artist to the book and be done with it. Make sure to get long boxes though - storage fills up fast that way.

[Huichillo]

All they can do is give an opinion with a percent below 100.

My new system would eliminate this.

 

Clayton Crain has been doing this for a while, so I don't think the system is really "new" or "yours"

 

 

[romanheart]

The majority of autographs I collect are from dealers who have spent a lot of time studying signatures of celebrities. That's the way it was done before CGC.

[kav]

All they can do is give an opinion with a percent below 100.

The print system would eliminate this.

 

Clayton Crain has been doing this for a while, so I don't think the system is really "new" or "yours"

 

Better?