• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Warning: Math (and the CGC Census)
0

45 posts in this topic

3 hours ago, valiantman said:

People could easily break the formula if they'd just return the old labels when they resubmit.  (:

The formula would still hold for the total number of books in the census, it just doesn't work for the number of slabs currently in circulation.

Edited by SeanYork
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/16/2021 at 12:13 PM, valiantman said:

Is CGC ready for that kind of growth?

The real question is:  Are CGC submittors ready for that type of growth knowing full well there is a direct inverse relation between quality and quantity, especially in the case of graded and slabbed books coming back from CGC?  :devil:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, SeanYork said:
22 hours ago, valiantman said:

People could easily break the formula if they'd just return the old labels when they resubmit.  (:

The formula would still hold for the total number of books in the census, it just doesn't work for the number of slabs currently in circulation.

I'm suggesting we've already had about 10 years of people resubmitting without returning the labels.  That's put us on the path we're on now.  If people started returning labels, we'd fall off that path, since a regraded book would take time at CGC, but wouldn't change the CGC Census at all.  (1 book on census, book is resubmitted and old label is returned, still 1 book on the census... over time, we'd notice if the counts didn't increase.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
0