PGM: Tales fromn the Crypt #40

[bye-migration]

Just got this off ebay...

-

-

[Steeler Nick]

I would say 5.5, nice looking book

[KingOfRulers]

I think 5.5 is definetly too high. The spine is just too worn, plus a chip and large crease. 4.5 from me.

[weaponx]

I love those old E.C. books!

 

Looks like a solid 4.0 to me. Just to much spine damage and that missing piece downgrades it as well.

[Steeler Nick]

I think 5.5 is definetly too high. The spine is just too worn, plus a chip and large crease. 4.5 from me.

 

Yeah, the spine is really beat up. far too many color-breaking creases for a FN book. But the colors are vibrant and the corners are pretty nice. This book has alot more eye appeal than alot of G or VG books

[KingOfRulers]

I think 5.5 is definetly too high. The spine is just too worn, plus a chip and large crease. 4.5 from me.

 

Yeah, the spine is really beat up. far too many color-breaking creases for a FN book. But the colors are vibrant and the corners are pretty nice. This book has alot more eye appeal than alot of G or VG books

 

Which puts it at a 4.5!!!

[bye-migration]

Thanks guys thats about where I was at a VG+ or so. I got it for 40 bucks so I guess I did alright.

[jeffb]

Nice bright colors, 4.5 at first glance

[Point Five]

Sharp edges, very nice eye appeal. The missing chip is so tiny I think it would barely affect this grade, if at all. Spine wear the only real problem. Torn between 4.5 & 5.0, but I'll say 4.5 to be safe. Nice pickup!

[mar-vell]

Sharp edges, very nice eye appeal. The missing chip is so tiny I think it would barely affect this grade, if at all. Spine wear the only real problem. Torn between 4.5 & 5.0, but I'll say 4.5 to be safe. Nice pickup!

 

4.5 seems pretty safe to me!

[-cryptkeeper-]

agreed with 4.5

an great EC cover