ABones90s

Thanks Paul - this provides so much more information compared to where this topic had been a year ago. Appreciate that update.

Haha. My favorite CGC ironic (moronic) take is the always off-centered sticker rating on the label. Like we shouldn’t be surprised with the centering grades doled out given these jokers couldn’t get their freaking labels centered for the longest time. Though in fairness the new labels fix this and it looks great. Now I have a bunch of graded cards with the horrible looking miscentered sticker mashed with the new labels - so is CGC’s suggestion to fix this to submit for reholder, giving them even more money for their shoddy work here? Probably better for a separate topic though…

I’m giving them some benefit of doubt here as it is customer facing and needs to get out to their website which can take more time then some jamoke slapping some ish together. They’re not Amazon… but yeah the point is it should have been done long ago and it’s ridiculous.

This is a joke. I will say I am a fan of CGC and if any of you folks work at a tech company or know someone that does - this “project” literally is something that could be banged out within a reasonable timeframe (six months to design and code a couple others to test). You don’t use graders to code, you use them to assist in the design/build and testing of the solution. You don’t have the resources internally? You outsource it to the bajillion consulting firms out there. From launch of the trading card service to now I would say is a enough time to do this twice over. Say what you want about PSA and their shenanigans, but CGC has been the worst with customer service. I mean bottom feeders like HGA have a pop tool and will answer literally every question you throw out at them at a fraction of the resources CGC has. CGC - get your act together!