• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

wurstisart

Member
  • Posts

    876
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by wurstisart

  1. 11 hours ago, Taylor G said:

    I assume this only refers to watercolor, since my understanding is that oil-based should be allowed to "breathe."

    Nevertheless, I'm not sure what the point is of "museum quality".  Even with UV glass, light is going to destroy art.  There is a reason that museum display rooms are gloomy.  I would have thought that best practice would be to only display a good scan of the OA, keeping the original hidden from light, and then spending $$$ on "museum-quality" glass just seems like a waste of resources (where the framing and glass may cost more than the OA).

    I'm basing a lot of this on Rune's excellent analysis of light levels and their deleterious effects on OA.  Perhaps this hobby is sorely in need of a code of best practices for displaying art (Starting with, don't display the original?).  Otherwise I worry that generations of OA is going to be lost to the actions of well-meaning amateurs.

    Happy to be educated further on this.....

     

    12 hours ago, delekkerste said:

    I would guess gouache & watercolor. 

    I had no idea. Thanks for clarifying.

  2. Hello everyone,

    actively seeking any kind of Spider-Ham artwork.

    From the original series, peter porker as well as marvel Tails and Tales. 

     

    Please send me a private message if you have any or know where to find some.

     

    thanks :-)

  3. For example a cover is currently over 4 k.

    For that price you could have picked the cover up / bought at dealer who had/ has it on his website.

     

    Only 2 folks are bidding and price is over what the item is on dealers website, but reserve not reached.

     

    nuff said

    I am staying away...