Dr1970-migration

The answer is simple: there are no high grade copies of this book in existence. wrong... If the highest grade of this book is a 3.0, then there are no high grade copies in existence. This was what I was talking about when I said you looked silly. Please stop it, you aren't is SOT's league, as you usually say smart things. Funny how you call me SOT, as I would rather you just call me d-bag. Uhhhhhhhhhm, ok. Or how about POS instead of SOT?

The answer is simple: there are no high grade copies of this book in existence. wrong... If the highest grade of this book in existence is and will always be a 3.0, then there are no high grade copies in existence. This was what I was talking about when I said you looked silly. Please stop it, you aren't is SOT's league, as you usually say smart things.

That is Sho'Nuff funny. Hey now, I'll never hit the heights of hilarity that Bug/BlackHeartedDwarf/ShoNuff did. He was the master! Well, I can always hope. Why did you can Bropper? That was awesome. Wasn't me (honestly). I only have one at a time.

The answer is simple: there are no high grade copies of this book in existence.

That is Sho'Nuff funny. Hey now, I'll never hit the heights of hilarity that Bug/BlackHeartedDwarf/ShoNuff did. He was the master!

Ahh, that was enjoyable. I don't mind derailing threads like these 'cause they've been rehashed so much already. Doodie calls!

See, Nick knew

No sir, I would not like to take the time to figure out why you are such a loser. It is probably because your parents left that coat hanger mark on your forehead before you were born. I kid, I kid. But I did ask a real question that you deflected with this stuff: if there is one copy of a Golden Age book in existence, and that book is coverless, do you consider it high grade? I would...if it was never intended to have a cover. Let's say it was intended to have a cover. Are you letting yourself get sucked back into this argument Richard? I remember the first time, you were left looking pretty silly. We all look silly at some point. At least you have cute kids. I wonder how that happened? Sharon already told you, my wife is hot! (You should see the boys dressed as Wolverine and The Hulk for FCBD. My 6 month old is 22 pounds!)

Me too. It's bad enough when the Regulars make you look foolish, but when a shill does it, it's just embarassing. Well alleybat I am glad you are admitting you are at least a shill. Wrong again. Ask around, it's obvious to some. See SOT, you shoulda went directly to Nick, he's pretty sharp (thumbs u (the good one)

No sir, I would not like to take the time to figure out why you are such a loser. It is probably because your parents left that coat hanger mark on your forehead before you were born. I kid, I kid. But I did ask a real question that you deflected with this stuff: if there is one copy of a Golden Age book in existence, and that book is coverless, do you consider it high grade? I would...if it was never intended to have a cover. Let's say it was intended to have a cover. Are you letting yourself get sucked back into this argument Richard? I remember the first time, you were left looking pretty silly.

No sir, I would not like to take the time to figure out why you are such a loser. It is probably because your parents left that coat hanger mark on your forehead before you were born. I kid, I kid. But I did ask a real question that you deflected with this stuff: if there is one copy of a Golden Age book in existence, and that book is coverless, do you consider it high grade?

If you can figure out how to.

Me too. It's bad enough when the Regulars make you look foolish, but when a shill does it, it's just embarassing. Well alleybat I am glad you are admitting you are at least a shill. Wrong again. Ask around, it's obvious to some.

Me too. It's bad enough when the Regulars make you look foolish, but when a shill does it, it's just embarassing.

So if the only known copy of a Golden Age book is coverless, you consider that high grade? I did. All your opinions are colored by money, I think that's obvious. If you could support your opinions without qualifying them/distorting the question then I would agree, but as it stands, you are just plain wrong.