-
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
-
Posts
1,849 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
CGC Journals
Gallery
Events
Store
Posts posted by suspense39
-
-
-
Wow! The linework is excellent, thanks for posting those!
-
On 2/16/2018 at 4:06 AM, cathy 1 said:
still for sale
Nice! The sketchy drawing for the bottom of the dress is pretty incredible, she has a beautiful signature as well.....are you going to Pøst the others?
-
6 hours ago, zhamlau said:
What am I missing here? These prices seem normal/reasonable in the current market, a few good buys with a steal, a few heavy pays with one head scratcher. Do most people think these prices are to high?
Yeah, I’m with you, it’s not like there’s an extra zero on everything
-
38 minutes ago, Ricksneatstuff said:
Herriman and Segar don’t fare too bad either.
, yeah they seem to be doing fine, Herriman has been going steadily up as far as I can tell, no dramatic jumps really just slow rise.....Segar seems to be flat, but holding its value.
-
1 hour ago, jjonahjameson11 said:
Now that the auction has started, I've finally taken the time to review the lots in their entirety, and noticed there's some really interesting Thor pieces up for grabs:
- Kirby Thor 154 cover. So, I've said it before and I'll say it once more, I don't get Kirby. I mean, I've tried for three decades to understand the appeal of this man's artwork and I guess it still hasn't registered yet. However, I do appreciate his contributions to the medium, and this cover is no exception, what with so many things going on. Very impressive and currently at $50K. https://comics.ha.com/itm/original-comic-art/jack-kirby-and-vince-colletta-thor-154-cover-original-art-marvel-1968-/a/7177-92132.s?ic4=GalleryView-Thumbnail-071515
- Olivier Coipel Mighty Thor #2 featuring Thor vs Silver Surfer. Love the way Olivier renders those super sleek lines and shine on the Surfer, even when Thor knocks him off his board. Soooo cheap right now at $65. https://comics.ha.com/itm/original-comic-art/olivier-coipel-and-mark-morales-mighty-thor-2-story-page-22-silver-surfer-original-art-marvel-2011-/a/7177-93482.s?ic4=GalleryView-Thumbnail-071515
- John Buscema Thor 222p2. Remember the Festivus episode on Sienfeld? Festivus, the Holiday for the rest of us? And George's father would try to engage him in the 'Feats of Strength'? Well, what's better than a good ol' fashioned arm wrestle match between the Mighty Thor and Hercules, the Lion of Olympus, as rendered by Big John Buscema? Current bidding is at $775. Here's the linky: https://comics.ha.com/itm/original-comic-art/john-buscema-and-joe-sinnott-thor-222-story-page-2-original-art-marvel-1974-/a/7177-92048.s?ic4=GalleryView-Thumbnail-071515
- Keith Pollard Thor #317p1 Splash with Iron Man at Cape Canaveral. This page is from 1982 and features very large image of Thor and Iron Man at Cape Canaveral, just after the 1st Space Shuttle launch ushered in a new era in space exploration, and the page is beautifully rendered by Pollard and Breeding. I've always felt that Pollard is an under rated artist, but Marvel must have thought highly of him because they put him to work on ASM, FF, and Thor, and I believe he was drawing at least two of them (or all three?) for two or three months consecutively at one point. Just a killer splash and currently only $800. Here's the link: https://comics.ha.com/itm/original-comic-art/keith-pollard-and-brett-breeding-thor-317-splash-page-1-original-art-marvel-1982-/a/7177-92195.s?ic4=GalleryView-Thumbnail-071515
What are your thoughts on the Thor pieces above?
In regard to Kirby, all I can say is he pretty much came up with the entire Marvel ensemble
-
Nice! I’m glad Stan didn’t sign that first one right in the middle
-
On January 4, 2018 at 1:40 AM, ESeffinga said:
After seeing the whole thing, I can say it's nothing that folks that follow just about any art market fairly closely hasn't already surmised for themselves, but it is interesting hearing some of the major "fine art" players put it into their own words. I wish they'd delved a bit deeper in the topic, but then as they sort of get at... transparency is something many players in the art market are trying to avoid for obvious reasons. Digging deeper would have been really fascinating, but highly unlikely. In truth, I was surprised at how candid some of the folks interviewed actually were.
I just wish there'd been more to it. I suppose for someone who isn't already deeply familiar with the inner workings of the art market, it might have been more revealing. I'd say it is great for folks just getting into art of any kind. There are economies of scale at play, but scale down millions into thousands, and many of the viewpoints expressed in the doc are very applicable to comic art.
I pretty much agree with everything you say here here, it's also poorly put together......what's with the soundtrack!? Also I know a couple people in the film and they are exactly the opposite of how they portray themselves....which is kind of funny. It's also funny that every individual seems to have the perspective that they are the ones doing the "right" way and everyone else is ruining art.
-
Haha!
-
-
hopefully this one didn't get away from you
-
On 12/6/2017 at 5:36 PM, delekkerste said:
I tend to think that the art depicting key moments from the series (many of which also made it to the TV show) will retain interest after the show goes off the air. This is the biggest break-out hit that an indie comic series has ever had. Sure, TMNT had some big movies and merchandising, but few cared about the comics after the first few years, and a lot of its success occurred in the pre-social media, pre-globalization era. WD at this point is 14+ continuous years into the comic, while the TV show has been must-see water cooler fodder for years now (and spawning a fairly successful spin-off as well). The merchandising, the memes, the blogs, the Tweets, the cosplay, the WD Escape, the contribution to the lexicon, the interviews and photoshoots of the cast and everything else that comes with being one of the biggest pop culture successes of a global, social media-mad era...all of which is to say that, yes, most pop culture is of its time and has a fleeting time in the spotlight, but, IMO, WD has achieved the kind of critical mass of success and, let's face it, importance when it comes to the history of comics (both indie and otherwise) and pop culture, that I think will keep its popularity/desirability largely intact long after the TV show ends.
I mean, FFS, people still want Cerebus art for being significant, even though it never enjoyed one iota of mainstream success...by the time it's all done, WD will have probably spanned at least two decades of comic success and been one of the most successful pop culture properties of all-time from its TV run. Maybe there's a knee-jerk dip following cancellation, but, I think the good stuff remains valuable/relevant for a long time to come. A-list is A-list.
Speaking of Cerebus
https://hyperallergic.com/415888/the-most-important-non-superhero-comic-youve-never-heard-of/
-
-
“Flipping has long been a bit of a boogeyman for art dealers and many high-level collectors, as it can distort an artist’s market and disrupt the careful calibrations of pricing and placement that guide art career management. In a 2014 statement, however, Christie’s told the Timesthat, “The speculative art buyer, or ‘flipper,’ motivated purely by short-term investment potential, is the anomaly in our experience.”
-
-
6 hours ago, SquareChaos said:
I see people making this statement more and more these days... wouldn't the proper thing be, for someone that feels this way, to simply tell the seller about the actual worth instead of making the purchase and then sharing some of whatever meat was left on the bone at a later date? The other side of the coin, I've never heard of a seller of a piece showing up to make a re-seller whole if the resell didn't go as planned.
My personal perspective, I'm not likely to ever be in the situation as far as I can tell, but if I find myself there I'll have to figure it out in real time; I haven't settled this question in my own mind yet.
I really haven’t settled it in my own head either, I have been on the losing end before (Much smaller potatoes) but enough to know that it sucks, and Im sure many others have been there.
Anyway I don’t know the whole story in this situation so I’ll just leave it there.
-
I should add I personally don’t think I could go ahead with the flip without giving some of the proceeds back to seller when it’s a discrepancy that large, there’s a HUGE difference in sale price vs value, and the seller I would assume, was naive to that
-
Who knows why the seller did it this way, which is what made me, and probably others hesitant. To me it seems like he knew,or thought, that they were worth st least 25k, so why not start the auction at 25k and see if it increases, instead of a BIN......but he didn’t
-
2 hours ago, SquareChaos said:
I can definitely see that, because even the little I know about Peanuts art had me squinting at it. I half expected to see a thread about the listing here... but it never emerged.
You just have to ask yourself why someone would do that, list it at a buy it now that suggests some idea of the worth, but refuses to send it to Heritage where - if the art is legit - they'd have cleared far, far more.
I don’t think it was up long enough for many to see
Yeah, it’s odd, but maybe someone just needed quick money....Heritage takes months to pay, or they don’t know about Heritage....it’s definitely odd
-
21 minutes ago, stinkininkin said:
Wow. You said you'd seen the auction. Were you tempted, knowing the Sunday alone, even with possible water damage would more than pay for price of the BIN? Of course, not everyone is liquid 25k at any given moment.
Scott
Yes I was very tempted but I didn’t have 25k, so there that, but I definitely thought about trying to get the money somehow.....and then it was gone.
theres also the “ if the deal is too good” theory that always enters my head ....I get hesitant.
-
I have to admit, i'm always a bit happier when a fan gets deal than when someone just flip something.....but, definitely a good score
-
18 minutes ago, stinkininkin said:
I just looked at that eBay auction, and it's interesting to note that it mentions the Peanuts Sunday as an "ink mockup". I assume that was just poor wording Mike, and that it was indeed the original? Looks like perhaps there was some water damage on the left side (lots of ripples on the edges from what I can see). Was it a bid auction or a buy it now for 25K? No matter what, this was a great buy, especially after the results from this Heritage auction!
Scott
it was a BIN.....a little h2o damage doesn't make that much difference
-
9 hours ago, romitaman said:
A local friend of mine just made a frickin KILLING on EBAY 3 weeks ago......He picked up 1 ebay lot which included a killer peanuts 1950s CHRISTMAS SUNDAY with ALL CHARACTERS present singing a Christmas song at school, with Linus telling Lucy he forgot his line...AND 5 more 50s DAILIES!!!!! and he bought em ALL FOR............ 24.5K.. ....The day he got em in and confirmed they were all real,...he shipped em all off to Heritage!!! LOL. (He offered me the sunday for 60k as i collect Christmas themed art..... but i passed.)
I saw that lot on eBay, a steal before those results.....we will find out soon if these prices were a one off after a couple auctions.
-
2 hours ago, batman_fan said:
I am still in a state of shock. I guess we will see the usual suspects raising the price of their Peanut artwork
if these guys would just not instantly jack things up due to one auction result i think they would do so much better!
The Official Feb 22-24 Heritage Auction Thread
in Original Comic Art
Posted
Damn, now it looks cheap