• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

FutureFlash

Member
  • Posts

    1,596
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by FutureFlash

  1. I picked up a copy at the LCS on Wednesday, I thought the story was good, with ahem a surprise inside. ;)

    I really don't care for the size of the book though (yes the book, not the other thing). I hope all of the Black Label stuff won't be in the oversize format. Otherwise it is trade wait for me.

  2. 18 hours ago, RockMyAmadeus said:

    Yeah, I read MD up to issue #26 or so....its premise was really fascinating, but they didn't go anywhere with it. It was just a never ending parade of "let's see what weird creatures we can encounter THIS issue"...and, from reading the comments they (the creators) wrote in their letters section, I am not surprised in the slightest. Too bad.

    Yeah it is a shame about MD. I was really enjoying it, but lately it is just been kinda meh. I plan on dropping it once this latest arc wraps up.

  3. I sent one of my 8 copies in and it received a 9.4 due to the score/scratch line down the front cover (grader notes). Somehow I missed the score line when I sent it in, but otherwise I believe it should be a 9.8. Unfortunately all of my copies have this score line to varying degrees. After reading this thread, apparently this score line is a manufacturing defect. Why is it being reduced in grade? I though manufacturing issues, got a pass.

  4. 21 hours ago, creaturefan95 said:

    How many is that? I've only got eighteen issues (7-16, 46, 61, 75, 101, 103, 107, 113, and 117).

    Only 13 AAMOW at the moment (6,17,23,64-65,73,77-78,94,97,110,112-113)

    Issues so far of other Big 5 titles:

    OFF:19

    SSWS/US:44

    GIC:57

    OAAW/SR:93

    Oddly enough AAMOW 110 was the first issue I purchased of the Big 5 titles back in 2014. Wish I would have been into them back in the 80's and 90s...they would have been a lot cheaper.

  5. 1 hour ago, creaturefan95 said:

    Beaters are still better than having no copy at all! I'm just waiting for a good deal on one of those issues to pop up on eBay:taptaptap:

    That is true about at least getting a copy. I'm not to picky (as long as it has a cover and complete) about these early issues. If I was waiting around for nice copies , I don't think I could complete a DC Big 5 run. Are you trying to complete all 5 titles as well, or a subset?

  6. 5 hours ago, revat said:

    on a super-unrelated note, we bought movie pass right before the Oscars to see all the best picture noms (we'd probably seen like two of them before that), and we ended up seeing 9/10 or 8/9 of them however many there were, all but one of the noms.  The only one we didn't see was Shape of Water, the one that won.  Our pick was Three Billboards, which I'm pretty sure should have won (a surprisingly high amount of people we know saw Shape of Water, and NOBODY LIKED IT, though many were impressed).  But as a crop, last year's was pretty good.  I thought Call Me by Your Name was probably the weakest, but so beautifully shot in such beautiful locations that you could it watch it for hours even if nothing is happening (which is literally the point of the movie).

    But seriously, go watch 3 billboards.  like now. 

    Also, wasn't Justin Hammer (played by Sam Rockwell, who was in 3 billboards) supposed to be british in Iron man 2?  I never heard Rockewell do british before, I was hoping to hear the accent.

    Three Billboards was a great movie. (thumbsu

  7. 3 hours ago, kevhtx said:

    You may be right, but let's not forget that these are the same people who nominated Avatar for Best Picture.

    Ugh Avatar what a terrible movie. BP was better, but still not Best Movie caliber in my opinion. Actually I don't think any superhero movie is worthy.