• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Comixculture

Member
  • Posts

    32
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Comixculture

  1. On 7/9/2021 at 5:51 AM, Bretd said:

    Thank you, this was very helpful and actionable advice! Yes, I'm a fan, and mostly looking to buy art to display - though would be nice if it appreciates over time as well in case I ever need to sell for whatever reason.

    Already talking about selling? I never thought of selling my John Byrne art when I was first collecting original art. I still have the Byrne and created a unique and exciting collection. Buy what makes you happy, not what will make you 2k in 2 years. A new collector with a great eye could have an amazing collection in twenty years or less. Most collectors won't last five years. 

  2. I have three pieces of art that I will try to donate next year to the Bill Ireland Museum or another museum that collects comic art. Good sentimental pieces that I have had for over 40 years and don't want to ever be flipped. More public exhibits will keep the art market healthy. The rest I will leave plenty of documentation for each one and make it simple for me or my family to sell or keep.

  3. I picked up a fresh copy of FF 232 at a con back in 1981 that John Byrne was at. When he signed it I later noticed that he added the number 3. Always wondered why. This issue came out that week so I was wondering if he was numbering the first few. Maybe a personal joke?

    IMG_7799.thumb.jpeg.1b8c98a4bce9a8a59ca2a9f42cf99306.jpegIMG_7798.thumb.jpeg.3689dfbf0b7ecd2d8dbe947b49900a0e.jpeg

  4. 20 hours ago, TheRedKollar said:

    Hey everyone. I bought a copy of Uncanny X-Men 168 the other day and when I opened it, there looked to be a Chris Claremont signature inside. It was not labeled as such by the store I got it from, so I looked it up to see if it looked authentic. It didn’t look like most of the other signatures I found, but not many I saw looked alike either. I decided to come here and seek as many outside opinions as possible. Here is a picture of it, let me know what you think. 

     

    image.jpg

     

    I got this one in the early 80's. Looks similar.

    1879722682_X-Men133.thumb.png.4cc295d806644367e928121a7986e38c.png

  5. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/features/stan-lee-needs-a-hero-elder-abuse-claims-a-battle-aging-marvel-creator-1101229

    My Dad is over 80 and still subscribes to the Hollywood Reporter. He sent me this link.

    Even he knows who Stan Lee is and was saddened to hear about his situation. I attended many SDCC back in the 90's and early 2000's and saw Stan around but I never wanted a signature. I'm glad I stuck to my tastes and not speculated. I still have SDCC signed books by Barry Windsor Smith and Al Williamson. Even CC Beck!

  6. 1 hour ago, thethedew said:

    Most Minneapolis conventions at that time were at the late, lamented Thunderbird Hotel.  :sigh::  Miss that crappy place.

    Yes the Thunderbird! There was a con there during a huge snow storm and I remember Dennis Kitchen comes in wearing a large fur coat and this tall beautiful woman with him. As a 15 year old it was very impressive. 

  7. 5 hours ago, Panelfan1 said:

    I think what is interesting about this image is that all the folks except Byrne are kids.  

    Nowadays - its all grown ups visiting artists booths. Unless a kid is tagging along with the parents.

    Ha! That’s true. And a kid took the photo. Kids really liked Byrne.