• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

AdRock181

Member
  • Posts

    34
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by AdRock181

  1. 6 hours ago, Pontoon said:

    Unless your local presser is CFP, CSS, Hero Restoration, Susan Ciccone or someone of that caliber, I would be very hesitant to take such a high value book to the proverbial local guy who presses comics, especially if it's your grail.

    Thanks for the tip! I follow the comic doctor in Ontario Canada, he is a certified shipper to CGC and is very reputable with samples of his work on his feed including many grails several Hulks and Golden Age Batman etc. Either way i’m still nervous sending it anywhere!! 

  2. 6 minutes ago, Point Five said:

    Whoops, looks like I was 100% wrong. Sorry about that! I thought there was some rust transfer in the original centerfold photo, but it must be the staples casting funky shadows there or something. My bad.

    Beautiful book; only real issue would be the structural bottom corner dent. I'll say 6.5/7.0 range as is but could certainly press a bit higher.

    No worries, that's why we're here. All feedback is appreciated. I didn't post the best pics at first. I just contacted a local comic presser/cleaner. Should clean that corner up nicely! I'll keep you posted! 

  3. 6 minutes ago, James J Johnson said:

    No. No rust at all. The close up reveals the absence of rust. Just a normal, mild coat of surface oxidation coating the outside, giving that grey appearance, but the paper is clean and the rusting process is absent.

    Good to know, thanks again! My naive opinion tells me this book is higher than a 5.0 or 6.5 as others kindly suggested. Especially after a press and clean? Thoughts anyone?

  4. 2 minutes ago, ADAMANTIUM said:

    Well I see your point lol imo or as far as I know, when it comes to the breaks in color, it depends if some are worse than others; meaning, yes there are a lot on this spine, but most are the same length. I do think that the "length" of each individual matters, kind of seems silly. But I think the grader's notes would read multiple spine ticks or heavy spine ticks, rather than a million of them. That leads me to believe that they would be "categorized" as one defect... 

    The more I think about it though, and for the sake of honesty it really probably is more 3.0/3.5. 

    I had a Fantastic Four 48 with not many bends where you open the book, like yours does, but it did have maybe half the spine issues that yours does and they were longer from spine into the cover. Meaning I'm pretty confident in the 3.5,

    I would love to hear how wrong I am lol and probably will :) 

    Haha, sounds like we're on the same page. I think I will have this cleaned, graded and slabbed and will definitely update this post. I'd be happy with that grade!

  5. 10 minutes ago, joeypost said:

    Creases on interior pages are very common, especially in bronze age books.

    The dirt and dust shadow will keep this book in the VF- range. The dirt would clean up easily and the dust shadow improved on which might bump the grade up.

    I'd be ok with that! And I think it would clean up nicely as well. Thanks for the feedback. Much appreciated

  6. 2 minutes ago, ADAMANTIUM said:

    it could be a 3.5, with the creases on the spine, they're not very long from the spine into the cover. The rest of the book looks decent though, page quality looks decent. From what you show of the inside, there are no pinholes.....

    I'd say 3.5 at worst, I know some would say 3.0 but imo it looks too good elsewhere, so I'd go 3.5/4.0

    Yeah the rest of the book looks good in my opinion as well. As I reference the Overstreet grading graph and 25 defects or more qualify as a "Poor" copy, I wasn't sure if all that spine stress made for a million defects