• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Juswuh

Member
  • Posts

    396
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Juswuh

  1. Ditko inked by anyone else isn't Ditko, to me anyway. He does so little art in the pencilling that either it comes out in the inker's style, or else the inker has to make an effort to finish it as fake-Ditko. (Better the first, I think. The second is totally pointless. When he gave up inking his own work-for-hire art he might as well have publicly announced that all that stuff was hack work.)

  2. 3 hours ago, ComicConnoisseur said:

    One thing with Ramos. He was a good Impulse artist. He should have stayed with Impulse because his art didn't suite Spider-Man.

    latest?cb=20060207115719

    I think what Marvel was trying to do was make Spider-Man more youthful with Ramos,but of course history tells us it backfired.

    lol

    That cover's certainly better (earlier?) than what I've seen from Ramos before. Somewhere along the line he seems to have turned up the distortion into wilful, pointless ugliness.

  3. On 11/07/2017 at 7:01 PM, Ken Aldred said:

    Hard to believe it was drawn by BWS.

    Barry Smith's early stuff was a bit... uhh. He drew people as if their skulls were shaped like light bulbs.

    Going on topic: for sheer ugliness, nothing comes close to the Ramos covers. His art isn't just bad, it's physically disgusting.

  4. 2 hours ago, Hamlet said:


    Citing low print runs as the death of comics is like citing CD sales as the death of music.  Music isn't going away, it just gets sold on iTunes these days instead of on a plastic disk.

     

    Musicians from more than one long-established band have said it isn't worth their time/money to put out a new album these days...

  5. Hands down the worst. So ugly I can't even bear to own it.

     

    braveandthebold_v1_054.jpg

     

    Lame villain, squiggle lines all over it like a kid with an ink pen, 2/3rd of the team down, ugly drab colors, no Titans logo.

     

    Just pure mess.

     

     

    Not to mention the hacked-off expression on Robin's face - like, "Why am I working with these losers?"

  6. The FF #66-67 story is not simply an "origin": is one of the most accomplished Lee/Kirby stories, and in my opinion one of the best Fantastic Four stories ever, and it is entirely centered around Warlock and his "fathers", with Alicia playing one of the most important roles ever. The climax is built up all along the two issues, and the story is also a poignant reflection on the theme of scientific research and man’s thirst for knowledge and power, that in my opinion it can be considered, a lot more than other similar cases, a single story.

     

    Actually Kirby's original idea for the story was drastically altered by Stan Lee. Kirby intended the scientists of the "Beehive" to be good guys!

  7. Don't suppose you know Pete Higham?

     

    Afraid not.

     

    Several of the stamp images seem to me to be obviously copied from books published/dated 1965 - Marvel Girl, Loki with winged headband, Stan with hat, Shazana. And why do a stamp for a one-off Dr Strange villain and not Baron Mordo, who was by far his most-featured bad guy of the time? It suggests someone picking characters without really knowing anything about them, perhaps not even their names since several stamps are unlettered.

  8. To me it looks as if someone in 1965 was given a handful of that month's Marvel comics and told to copy the faces - quite possibly someone who'd never seen any of the characters before. (Yeah, there was some crude artwork in early Marvel stories, but did anything as bad as that Dr Doom ever get into an actual book?)

     

    They also remind me of the ads for a Marvel board game which appeared in the comics a while later (early 1967?) which showed extremely amateurish pics of Giant-Man and the Wasp, among others.