I'm a little late to the game following this. I had a few questions and I'm sorry if they have been addressed already. I stopped reading around page 50 so 157 is a little daunting.
1. If I remember correctly, the language for reholder used to indicate that the book would be re-evaulated and it wouldn't guarantee the same grade. That language is different now it seems.
2. If the submitter indicated they missed anything on several books, why would CGC not open the inner well and verify? Even if it happened on one book, how do you not verify? I understand CGC is overwhelmed, but I would think this is crucial.
3. Lastly and I'm not into conspiracy theories, but is it possible that certain individuals at CGC, not CGC as a company may be involved? I know that might be a stretch, but is that even a possibility or has that been debunked?
I haven't been a CGC retailer since the $200 fee was implemented, but when I start up again I'm concerned about submitting reholder or any submission for customers. Do I have a valid concern?