• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

dekeuk

Member
  • Posts

    3,785
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by dekeuk

  1.  

    Mags like LIFE are eventually going to get scarce because dealers keep cutting them up and selling the individual ads. Ironically, it will be the mags with "boring" non-celebrity covers that will eventually become the hardest to find.

     

    When you can only sell a non-celeb 1940's mag for $3 but can get $30 worth of ad pages out of it, they will eventually all get cut apart by dealers. At that point, it will be hard to find any intact LIFE mags with non-celeb covers.

     

     

     

     

     

  2.  

    they are not worth that much.

     

    sell the ones with recognizable movie stars, sports stars, sports teams, and political figures (Hitler, Stalin) individually on ebay. I used to get maybe $20 apiece for the better ones.

     

    a few might even go to $50 like marilyn monroe.

     

    and I think a couple might have baseball cards in them? was that LIFE mag? those are worth big $$.

     

    sell the rest in larger lots because the ones with average covers are only worth a few $$ each, except perhaps the ones from the early 1930's

     

    And sell the 1963 Roger Staubach cover to me for $10 (thumbs u (it's extremely rare)

     

     

     

     

     

     

  3. The good news is the Clink Focused Auction results are now in the GPA system and many titles and keys have "Green Up Arrows" next to them when I just checked :golfclap:

     

    It appears this thread and the comments made by many helped convince George to go ahead and include it.

     

    I started the thread so you can all thank me now. :hi:

     

    Donations of your comics to me as thanks will be accepted. :jokealert:

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  4. But as I said, the 1600+ sales that just occurred through their (CL's) latest auction are ready to include if we choose to do so. The question is, would you guys be happy that only some of CL's results are included (auction style) and not others (consignment style).

     

    George.

     

     

     

    Why would you not report ALL of the info your company collected, even if that info is incomplete. The consignments are usually only reinforcing results that have already been achieved elsewhere like ebay, since the best stuff does NOT go on consignment in general.

     

    Whereas the focused auction results show books that are rarely sold, and have not had any update in your database since 2002 (i.e. golden age sales)

     

     

  5.  

    It's not a matter of what Comiclink wants or does not want.

     

    The solution is simple. Once a month GPA needs to manually enter the auction results once the auctions have ended. All the results are sitting right there for anyone to view, here is an example of a listing of past results.

     

    The results are sitting right there. These are very important sales.

     

    Someone at GPA needs to spend 10 hours a month manually going through these results and recording them.

     

    More and more quality material is migrating from Heritage and ebay to Comiclink Focused. If GPA does not start reporting it, their database will be woefully inadequate for the best material out there.

     

    Sure they can give me a very accurate estimate on ASM #300 9.6

     

    But for stuff where they have no recorded sales since 2002 or 2003, and then a sale is made on Comiclink Focused and this updated price is NOT recorded, I think that is a real dis-service to their subscribers

     

     

  6.  

    GPA risks becoming totally irrelevant for info on ultra high grade sales if they do not start reporting GPA Focused Auction results.

     

    The latest Focused results blew away many of the numbers on the GPA, especially for Golden Age stuff where no copy has sold since 2003. And for bronze 9.8 Marvels where the highest reported sale on GPA is for a 9.6

     

    I don't know why GPA does not report on Comiclink, but they should AT LEAST report the Focused results. Those types of sales are sorely lacking from the current GPA database.

     

     

     

     

     

  7. hmmm, well a lot of these guys don't seem so "underrated" as they were "hot" in their time (dale keown, art adams, etc.) are semi-"legends" (or second tier legends) - kaluta, maybe ploog

     

     

     

    Exactly. That's why I left a guy like Art Adams off my original list. Great artist, but he got TONS of recognition, praise, and covers in his day. Nothing under appreciated about him in my opinion.

     

    But is hard to tell with post 1985 artists. Were they really appreciated by the public? Or did you just see their name a lot because Wizard and your LCS had a vested interested in promoting their name as a "great investment" so buy 20 copies for the future.

     

     

  8. I've always been a big Kieth Giffen fan. I think all his work on Legion was fantastic.

     

    I remember when his Legion issues were so hot, everyone was "investing" in them. I remember buying 5 copies of #300. And Legion got that Baxter paper book. So much hype.

     

    Now his issues on the run sell for the same price as the issues before he got there. What happened? Were there any real fans of this series or was it all just price speculation.

     

     

     

     

  9.  

    Some artists get all the fame, glory and prices for their original art (i.e. Adams, Miller, Ditko, Kirby, Wrightson, McFarlane, Lee, Smith, Byrne, etc.)

     

    Others work away year after year, producing great art, but are (relatively) unappeciated and underrated.

     

    Who do you think are some of the most talented yet under appreciated artists since the Marvel era began in 1961?

     

    A few of my favorites that come to mind (ignore the bad spelling):

     

    Bill Sienkevitz

    Jim Aparo

    Dave Cockrum

    John Romita Jr.

    Marshall Rogers

    Dave Sim

    George Perez

    Klaus Janson

    Steven Bissette

    John Totelbaum

    Curt Swan

    Brian Boland

    Norm Breyfogle

    Neil Gaiman

    Jose Garcia-Lopez

    Jim Starlin

     

     

    So who is on your list as being under rated and deserving of more historical acclaim that they currently get?