• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

sagekilz

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,250

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by sagekilz

  1. sagekilz
    HOLY BLEEP! When contacted (I'm assuming you've called/e-mailed) did they give a reason as to why?
  2. sagekilz
    9, nice book!
  3. sagekilz
    8.5
  4. sagekilz
    7.0
  5. sagekilz
    Nice looking book! 9.2 - 9.4
  6. sagekilz
    The more wrong I am, the happier I'll be!
  7. sagekilz
    All fair points and again, I hope I'm criminally wrong. Blips was maybe an incorrect word because there'll be a good amount of new footage. Perhaps what I meant was that the new footage, while plentiful, will be periodic and short throughout. Not saying I'm right and not trolling, nor am I being a naysayer for laughs. Fingers crossed this is a grand slam because what's good for the goose is good for the gander.
  8. sagekilz
    I'm a pessimist through and through. The actual cut won't live up to the hype, IMO.
  9. sagekilz
    Don't care the recourse, have had enough: the Snyder cut isn't going to redeem this movie. Being a wet blanket but my 'gut' tells me the excitement and anticipation will eventually become disappointment and anger. In my heart of hearts the Snyder cut will produce only blips of new footage and be a colossal failure. I WANT to be wrong however I think the build-up for this will be a major let-down.
  10. sagekilz
    A STRETCH, but Gwen Stacy?
  11. sagekilz
    Will never not love that faux wave coming off the 'Q'.
  12. sagekilz
  13. sagekilz
  14. sagekilz
    Thank you!
  15. sagekilz
    Thank you!
  16. sagekilz
    Thank you!
  17. sagekilz
  18. sagekilz
    4.5
  19. sagekilz
  20. sagekilz
    Totally agree. Moreover, COVID certainly has changed the entire world irrevocably so no doubt there are protocols in place at CGC just the same; stands to reason they were affected too. There's a difficult balance me thinks. Like you said, making hundreds of new hires to get ahead, then ultimately fire/let go that same number because the supply drops. Their system is great and they know it.
  21. sagekilz
    Agree with all of this, make the process well-oiled opposed to herkie jerky.
  22. sagekilz
    Alright guys and gals, start updating those resumes...https://recruitingbypaycor.com/career/CareerHome.action?clientId=8a7882525c3d7d8e015c6b03a47c11dc
  23. sagekilz
    Problem with new hires is that graders aren't a dime a dozen (not suggesting you don't know that, just thinking out loud). I'd guess that every Joe Q Collector thinks they can professionally grade books, cards, etc. but fact is, 99.9% sure they can't and while they may know their stuff, training is still necessary. Personally, I think they need to open another 'hub' in a different state - West Coast or Midwest perhaps - to assist with the influx of being bogged down by thousands upon thousands of submissions a month.
  24. sagekilz
    Agreed. 10 years ago? There would be a 2 month waiting list for the signature. Now? Sorry to say, but I don't understand why people lose their soup over a Miller signing.
  25. sagekilz
    It would be one thing if CGC came out and bluntly said, "Look because of all these signings, TAT's are going to increases by X amount". But to sit on their proverbial grading hands and say nothing kind of sucks. I'm fairly certain a majority of non-signature submitters would be upset but also appreciate CGC being upfront. All anyone wants is transparency and CGC should know that or at minimum acknowledge the back-log.