I'm new. I'll give you that. But I keep reading all these comments telling me to think about it logically--taken to end results, we know that logic is not always the best guide. If you're eating the last meal in the world and you will not share, logic dictates someone either shares or someone dies. Logic doesn't seem so appealing when someone is harmed by the outcome. Please hear me out.
By taking the stance that a comic should be downgraded in quality if it has an unverified signature, CGC is basically creating a market where publishers feel pressured to pay them to verify sigs or else pre-signed issues become worth less than if they had no signatures at all. Seems like an unfair competitive advantage to me. Sure, a business has the right to survive. I wonder how quick the staunchest defenders would be to defend such choices if their collections were the ones suddenly devalued by one business's decision(s) in the name of self-interest.
I've been civil and offered valid commentary. Please approve what I've said because dissent is crucial for growth.
