rob_react

Happy! #1 CGC 9.6 Image Grant Morrison Darick Robertson Happy! #1 Variant CGC 9.4 Image Grant Morrison Robertson Happy! #2 CGC 9.8 Image Grant Morrison Darick Robertson Happy! #2 CGC 9.8 Image 2nd Printing Morrison Robertson Happy! #3 CGC 9.8 Image Grant Morrison Darick Robertson Happy! #3 CGC 9.4 Variant Image Morrison Robertson Happy! #4 CGC 9.8 Variant Image Morrison Robertson Happy! #4 CGC 9.8 Image Grant Morrison Darick Robertson

I won 6

One of my favorite books in the run. helluva cover.

I've only ever seen that once.

And bidding on some of your books

Those look sharp!

Rob - you are too kind. I had only seen half the books at that point. It held up over the whole run. Obviously, I knew your run was nice, but it's better than the numerical grade would indicate (which is kind of crazy when you consider it's the #1 registry set )

Yeah, the trifecta of 9.6s in, I think, 2010.

Personally, I'd be more upset with multiple 9.4s going on at once than the presence of a 9.6 against a 9.4. Speaking from personal (and very recent) experience, a 9.4 buyer is not necessarily going to be able to double up and move to the 9.6. Splitting the 9.4 bids would bug me more. Although, really, this is a lot of high grade copies at once in a really short period of time. This is like the period a few years ago when three 9.6s sold in short order.

Holy cow.

I don't see anything wrong with the ComicLink copy that would keep it out of 9.4. If I was still in the market that copy would be tempting to me. The ComicConnect copy has some issues that appear in the scan that I'm not sure are as bad in real-life as they appear in that scan. If I were interested in it, I'd get the graders notes. The "stain" is definitely not a stain, for example, and I wonder how much you would even see it in hand.

The ComicLink copy is really sweet. The CC copy is nice, but not as nice as that White pager.

on, that's a killer copy. What a great run of books between the two auction houses. If you were starting a Daredevil collection now would be the time.

More scans are up. Whoever put this run together had a great eye. Killer, killer books.

The colors on the book are so rich it hurts. There are indeed a couple factors with this book that I'm not in love with. Still it is one of the best examples of a #7 I've ever seen. I think it's sharper than the PC copy (although the PC copy is better looking)

I want my Daredevil run to grow up to be this Daredevil run.

I don't like the miscut on that book, but it's as well preserved as you're going to find DD #7. Sharp as hell.

The scans are starting to show up:

I just bought that over the weekend. Looking forward to it. I heard great things about the writer Tom King. It's really great. Super thoughtful and intelligent, but it still packs some emotional punch.

Can someone hook me up? I'm looking to start converting other original pedigree lists (when available) to digital formats.

Yeah. Usually a list of what you've read and a running total.

If so Vision 1-12 is a damn fine start to the year. Damn fine. Although I'm off pace, it seems.

What's the story? You just check in with your count from time to time? I'm curious what I'd get to.

Have you attempted to clear your cached pages? If you hit CTRL H you can clear your cookies and cached pages. This usually helps. I'm trying to recreate what you are describing, but it is working okay for me. Please feel free to call me and perhaps we can work through it together over the phone? 941-360-3991 ext 250 I am still getting the same issue. Every time I put my mouse in the title field the drop-down opens and then closes immediately. It's constantly updating the field's focus and clearing out any inputs. There's some screwed up logic in the "focusElem($event)" function attached to that custom element. "Have you attempted to clear your cached pages" While that's useful to debug, you shouldn't have to tell your users to do that. If you had a build process (with Gulp, Grunt, whatever) that combined all of your application's JavaScript files into a single file and renamed it with a unique hash as a file name, then not only would your app be faster (less files = faster) whenever you updated the code you would be guaranteeing that the user would have to get the new files (a new file name = it must request the file from the server anew.) No need to clear cache! Hopefully whoever is building this already has this on their to-do list. If they don't, they should get it on that list right now. Other feedback- please fix the tab order. Test the form with just a keyboard. You should be able to enter data and then logically tab to the next field. As it stands now, you enter data in any field and then it returns to tabindex="0." There's a lot to like about the usability of the new form, but keyboard usability is great for power users. I want to be able to do pure data-entry on these forms and getting tab order right is web development 101 (and I wrote a book that's used to teach web development 101 so, in one way, I'm actually in charge of making that call )