• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

OA article in today's Dallas paper !!

Started by bhhooks22,

15 posts in this topic

Sharkey

Sharkey

Posted
Posted

Thanks for posting! This is the same article that appeared in the New York Times (copy syndicated to other papers). It's cool to see the pickup by the Dallas paper. An unusually well done article about the collectibles market.

 

The best article on OA is still Glen Gold's Playboy article from the Dec 2004 issue.

 

--Steve

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sharkey

Sharkey

Posted
Posted
It's the same article, but one big difference is that this reprint shows the OA for GS X-MEN #1. I don't believe it's ever been shown publicly before.

 

Interesting, Felix, I didn't know that! So does that belong to Dave Mandel? The photo credit is cut off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bhhooks22

bhhooks22

Posted
  • Author
Posted
It's the same article, but one big difference is that this reprint shows the OA for GS X-MEN #1. I don't believe it's ever been shown publicly before.

 

Interesting, Felix, I didn't know that! So does that belong to Dave Mandel? The photo credit is cut off.

 

do you need it ? ...It was difficult to fit in scanner ..........

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bhhooks22

bhhooks22

Posted
  • Author
Posted
It's the same article, but one big difference is that this reprint shows the OA for GS X-MEN #1. I don't believe it's ever been shown publicly before.

 

Interesting, Felix, I didn't know that! So does that belong to Dave Mandel? The photo credit is cut off.

 

do you need it ? ...It was difficult to fit in scanner ..........

 

It quotes "New York Times" at bottom , ..That's all !..............

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sharkey

Sharkey

Posted
Posted
It's the same article, but one big difference is that this reprint shows the OA for GS X-MEN #1. I don't believe it's ever been shown publicly before.

 

Interesting, Felix, I didn't know that! So does that belong to Dave Mandel? The photo credit is cut off.

 

do you need it ? ...It was difficult to fit in scanner ..........

 

It quotes "New York Times" at bottom , ..That's all !..............

 

Right under the picture of the X-Men art it says "Courtesy of D M" and is cut off. What's it say, D Mandel?

 

--Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bhhooks22

bhhooks22

Posted
  • Author
Posted
It's the same article, but one big difference is that this reprint shows the OA for GS X-MEN #1. I don't believe it's ever been shown publicly before.

 

Interesting, Felix, I didn't know that! So does that belong to Dave Mandel? The photo credit is cut off.

 

do you need it ? ...It was difficult to fit in scanner ..........

 

It quotes "New York Times" at bottom , ..That's all !..............

 

Right under the picture of the X-Men art it says "Courtesy of D M" and is cut off. What's it say, D Mandel?

 

--Steve

 

Yes , D. Mandel , Marvel .........

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nexus

Nexus

Posted
Posted
It's the same article, but one big difference is that this reprint shows the OA for GS X-MEN #1. I don't believe it's ever been shown publicly before.

 

Interesting, Felix, I didn't know that! So does that belong to Dave Mandel? The photo credit is cut off.

 

I don't think it's a secret anymore, lol! Yes, that is David's cover. And if you look closely, the photo credit is for "D.M-" before it gets cut off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sharkey

Sharkey

Posted
Posted
It's the same article, but one big difference is that this reprint shows the OA for GS X-MEN #1. I don't believe it's ever been shown publicly before.

 

Interesting, Felix, I didn't know that! So does that belong to Dave Mandel? The photo credit is cut off.

 

I don't think it's a secret anymore, lol! Yes, that is David's cover. And if you look closely, the photo credit is for "D.M-" before it gets cut off.

 

That's what I was assuming, just didn't want to do so without being sure.

 

Oh, and Glen's article on OA was in the Dec 2004 issue of Playboy (Denise Richards cover) not 2006 as I had said earlier. I'll go back and edit that.

 

Steve

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mister_not_so_nice

mister_not_so_nice

Posted
Posted
It's the same article, but one big difference is that this reprint shows the OA for GS X-MEN #1. I don't believe it's ever been shown publicly before.

 

Interesting, Felix, I didn't know that! So does that belong to Dave Mandel? The photo credit is cut off.

 

do you need it ? ...It was difficult to fit in scanner ..........

 

It quotes "New York Times" at bottom , ..That's all !..............

 

Right under the picture of the X-Men art it says "Courtesy of D M" and is cut off. What's it say, D Mandel?

 

--Steve

 

I think the answer is here, in this paragraph.

The article makes no mention if he has any PREACHER pages or HELLBLAZER covers, so I don't see what all the fuss is about :baiting:

61395-07-05-2008015106PM.jpg.5c07f2d9208f36e5d4c97298857cf0b7.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brian Peck

Brian Peck

Posted
Posted

In the online new york times version of the article its didn't show the OA for GS X-Men #1 but the one printed in the NY Times paper did have a pic of it. Its the same article.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sharkey

Sharkey

Posted
Posted
It's the same article, but one big difference is that this reprint shows the OA for GS X-MEN #1. I don't believe it's ever been shown publicly before.

 

Interesting, Felix, I didn't know that! So does that belong to Dave Mandel? The photo credit is cut off.

 

do you need it ? ...It was difficult to fit in scanner ..........

 

It quotes "New York Times" at bottom , ..That's all !..............

 

Right under the picture of the X-Men art it says "Courtesy of D M" and is cut off. What's it say, D Mandel?

 

--Steve

 

I think the answer is here, in this paragraph.

The article makes no mention if he has any PREACHER pages or HELLBLAZER covers, so I don't see what all the fuss is about :baiting:

 

doh! Me am good reader!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ares

Ares

Posted
Posted
It's the same article, but one big difference is that this reprint shows the OA for GS X-MEN #1. I don't believe it's ever been shown publicly before.

 

Interesting, Felix, I didn't know that! So does that belong to Dave Mandel? The photo credit is cut off.

 

do you need it ? ...It was difficult to fit in scanner ..........

 

It quotes "New York Times" at bottom , ..That's all !..............

 

Right under the picture of the X-Men art it says "Courtesy of D M" and is cut off. What's it say, D Mandel?

 

--Steve

 

I think the answer is here, in this paragraph.

The article makes no mention if he has any PREACHER pages or HELLBLAZER covers, so I don't see what all the fuss is about :baiting:

 

It not like Hellblazer and Preacher are good Comics.

Crappy art and stories written by a hack

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Go to topic listing