NEW pgx LISTING ON COMICLINK! BUMPED TO TELL THE UN-INFORMED!

[sborock]

This is just very funny and at the same time, REALLY BAD for the hobby! It is why I disagree with dealers listing pgx books and why I NEVER would buy one. If they are not incompetent, then they must be......

 

I love the sellers comments, at least there is some full disclosure from him, if not on the pgx faux-label. I guess CGC caught it so the owner decided to send it to people who have no clue what they are doing (That's an "edjumacated" guess, I could be wrong about that seller, but not as wrong as pgx about this back cover ).

 

 

EARLY ACTION COMIC....OH,NO!!!!!

[greggy]

Hater

[sborock]

Hater

 

 

What does that make you??

[greggy]

Hater

 

 

What does that make you??

[Pitboss]

I believe that book was for sale HERE at one time!

[Ze-man]

Aww c'mon Steve, it's only the back cover, nobody will even notice!

 

[sborock]

Aww c'mon Steve, it's only the back cover, nobody will even notice!

 

 

Hey, maybe it's pressed....that would be even worse!!!

 

[Ze-man]

Aww c'mon Steve, it's only the back cover, nobody will even notice!

 

 

Hey, maybe it's pressed....that would be even worse!!!

 

 

It was pressed, thats why the cover split, and turned into another cover.

 

[Designer Toast]

" Would be incomplete per CGC due to wrong back cover being married. "

 

[Flash105]

PGX=radioactive

[musicmeta]

NO PGX for me...ever, unless all I want is a bunch of books in plastic cases ONLY for protection. Restored,who cares...what me worry!

[He11blazer]

" Would be incomplete per CGC due to wrong back cover being married. "

 

 

Yeah well, grading is subjective isn't it? Those CGC guys are such nitpickers!

 

 

[brasseye]

" Would be incomplete per CGC due to wrong back cover being married. "

 

 

Yeah well, grading is subjective isn't it? Those CGC guys are such nitpickers!

 

 

Real ball-breakers

 

Moments like this you feel awefully thankful for the 'how & why' of what they do... but I'm sure it'll be short lived

[THE_BEYONDER]

Why rip PGX? You still on the CGC payroll or something....?

[Old Fashion PB and J]

Damn... At least the front covers there

 

PGX JUNK

[Annihilus]

" Would be incomplete per CGC due to wrong back cover being married. "

 

 

wow....incomplete.....ya think? They should've put the back cover of a modern on there and see what PGX would have graded it.

 

Probably a 1.5 (think about it - the back cover would be in better shape).

[jordanscott]

could it really be considered 'married' if the 2 pieces of cover aren't actually attached to each other or the book?

 

sounds like they're 'living apart' at this time gearing up for a messy divorce.

[PokerKid]

Perhaps that back cover is from the Sub-Mariner #1 with the wrong back cover floating around here.

[gpanalysis]

With the back cover missing, did PGX make a mistake on the label? I mean, isn't this a Variant of some type?

 

[sborock]

Why rip PGX? You still on the CGC payroll or something....?

 

They only pay me $10 a week.....and that's to bother you!!!!

 

These guys are just bad :censored:in' news!