• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Do you think this book should have been graded lower by CGC?

Do you think this book should have been graded lower than 9.4 by CGC?  

540 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you think this book should have been graded lower than 9.4 by CGC?

    • 21173
    • 21174


81 posts in this topic

I came across this book on Comiclink.

 

With that large dust shadow and name written on the cover, do you think this book should have been graded lower than 9.4 by CGC? (see poll below)

 

 

RAD59F772009529_184526.jpg

 

 

I honestly do not get the need to threadcrahp on a book currently listed for sale. :(

 

It's one thing to question what should and should not be allowed in grade, and another altogether to knock a specific book based on a scan. Who knows what this book looks like in hand, or how any of us would grade it if given the chance.

 

I bet this book is a stunner, writing and shadow included and could see a case being made for 9.0, 9.2 or 9.4 given ones personal preference and interpretation of grading guidelines.

 

It isn't a botched grade, far from it imho. It's a 9.6 book, with 9.2 eye appeal.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites