• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The 2010 Nik Memorial Grading Contest *Round 5*

Started by DrWatson,

133 posts in this topic

Shark

Shark

Posted
Posted

Absolutely ridiculous. My 9.6 is better looking than this copy (and yeah I looked). With those 2 spots on the back plus the LL bent corner there's no way that's a 9.8.

 

I give up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Warlord

Warlord

Posted
Posted
Absolutely ridiculous. My 9.6 is better looking than this copy (and yeah I looked). With those 2 spots on the back plus the LL bent corner there's no way that's a 9.8.

 

I give up.

 

Agreed, unless they are actually imperceptible flaws magnified by the scanner. That's what I banked on.

 

Hang in there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AJD

AJD

Posted
Posted
Absolutely ridiculous. My 9.6 is better looking than this copy (and yeah I looked). With those 2 spots on the back plus the LL bent corner there's no way that's a 9.8.

 

I give up.

I said 9.8 (shrug)

 

I was thinking I was going to learn something from this round. The book looked like a lay down 9.8 - except for those spots. Given that conventional wisdom is "CGC hammers stains", what happened here?

 

Not complaining - just trying to learn. (shrug)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Go to topic listing