• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

PGM Nick Fury #4

14 posts in this topic

You know, a couple of weeks ago, I would have said 8.5/9.0, but at EMCC Steve B. looked over my tanned XM #8 with very clean edges and very nice spine (no color breaks anywhere) and said something like "very, very nice book, you should get a 6.5" and I lost my dinner. :sick:

 

I guess Steve really doesn't like sun shadow. The thing is, I have an old label 9.4 with more shadow than that, so I'm thinking that when it comes to tanning, I have no idea. I've heard that they've gotten tougher on tanning at CGC lately.

 

That being said, the tanning on your book isn't bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, a couple of weeks ago, I would have said 8.5/9.0, but at EMCC Steve B. looked over my tanned XM #8 with very clean edges and very nice spine (no color breaks anywhere) and said something like "very, very nice book, you should get a 6.5" and I lost my dinner. :sick:

 

Stevie B. is quite the charmer, eh? lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've heard that they've gotten tougher on tanning at CGC lately.

 

That being said, the tanning on your book isn't bad.

 

 

I agree on both points, except that they have always been tough on tanning at the CGC. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shield4.jpg

 

Here is mine, it has a little chip out on the back, and still got a 9.0... Mine has slight tanning too... in my opinion yours is an 8.0-9.0, wouldn't be surprised if it got a 9.0, i'd be more surprised if it got an 8.0 actually. Just my opinion man :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is mine, it has a little chip out on the back, and still got a 9.0... Mine has slight tanning too... in my opinion yours is an 8.0-9.0, wouldn't be surprised if it got a 9.0, i'd be more surprised if it got an 8.0 actually. Just my opinion man :)

 

:hi:Lloyd,

The chip out on the back is a production defect for this issue, and your tanning is significantly less (as corroborated with the PQ). Man, Steranko does do a NICE sig! Just my opinion too!

-d

Link to comment
Share on other sites