PGM Spider-Man # 132

[NYNick]

Thanks

 

 

[Columbia Comics]

6.5/7.0

 

My question is...what happened? Was the cover printing so off that they basically left a 1/2" off the cover on the right side?

 

It doesn't look trimmed b/c the back cover lines up but geez...you would think that would have been culled.

[joeypost]

It is a mis-wrap. Back to front cover mis-wrap. This one is severe. I see creases. CGC will not downgrade for the mis-wrap.

 

7.0

[NYNick]

It is a mis-wrap. Back to front cover mis-wrap. This one is severe. I see creases. CGC will not downgrade for the mis-wrap.

 

7.0

 

That's what I was waiting for a response for, was the miswrap. I didn't think it was trimmed but I still wanted some other opinions.

[Columbia Comics]

It is a mis-wrap. Back to front cover mis-wrap. This one is severe. I see creases. CGC will not downgrade for the mis-wrap.

 

7.0

 

CGC may not downgrade for the miswrap, but it's certainly not a desirable quality in a book.

 

Of course, that's just my opinion

[NYNick]

It is a mis-wrap. Back to front cover mis-wrap. This one is severe. I see creases. CGC will not downgrade for the mis-wrap.

 

7.0

 

CGC may not downgrade for the miswrap, but it's certainly not a desirable quality in a book.

 

Of course, that's just my opinion

 

I'm not to fond of it myself

[oakman29]

7.0 miswrap is pretty severe,hurts desirability.

[Warren Oates]

an ugly 7.5

[apollobuzz]

Looks like an 8.0 to me.

[NYNick]

Looks like an 8.0 to me.

 

Thanks, I thought the book was in pretty good shape myself except for the HORRENDOUS miswrap.

[apollobuzz]

Yep. Might even be an 8.5/9.0 in hand. Scans seem to magnify any flaws. Also, my experience with personal submissions has been that boardies grade just a little harsher than CGC!

[Ditch Fahrenheit]

It is a mis-wrap. Back to front cover mis-wrap. This one is severe. I see creases. CGC will not downgrade for the mis-wrap.

 

7.0

 

I see creases too. I think it's 7.0, maybe 7.5.

[Calamerica]

8.0.

[tjanse]

7.5