X-Men #95 s'il-vous plait

[divad]

@150 dpi, reduced to 5" width, no compression:

 

 

[oakman29]

Love the scanner David. The book 7.0

[divad]

Just trying out some different settings . . .

[oakman29]

Just trying out some different settings . . .

I value your opinion greatly,what's your opinion of the book?

[divad]

@200 dpi / reduced to 5" width, no compression:

 

 

[divad]

Just trying out some different settings . . .

I value your opinion greatly,what's your opinion of the book?

 

Thanks, there's a lot going on that isn't necessarily visible in the scan. I've got it at 6.0

[oakman29]

probably closer at 6.0 with the foxing.

[porky]

i'll go 8.0 based on what i can see

[Mio]

8... 8.5+ with a squeeze

[ARK]

6.5

[Ditch Fahrenheit]

Big scan 6.0/6.5.

 

Small scan 6.5/7.0.

 

[marvelcollector]

Hey David

 

 

5.5-6.0, leaning toward the higher grade, based on 200 dpi scan.

 

Smaller scan doesn't show flaws suffuciently on this particualar book...

[divad]

Hey David

 

 

5.5-6.0, leaning toward the higher grade, based on 200 dpi scan.

 

Smaller scan doesn't show flaws suffuciently on this particualar book...

 

Yep, that's what I was thinking also - listed it with the 200 dpi scans

[divad]

6.5

 

Thanks!

[divad]

8... 8.5+ with a squeeze

 

MUCHAS GRACIAS!

[THB]

6.5. What kind of scanner are you using? I must get one for myself.

[porky]

just re-looked at the larger scan. is that a tear through frog-dude?

[divad]

just re-looked at the larger scan. is that a tear through frog-dude?

 

Nope, printer's crease

[divad]

6.5. What kind of scanner are you using? I must get one for myself.

 

Nothing special - Epson V350

[ImperiusRex]

I would say 7.5, due to foxing/soot on the BC and the creasing