• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

SOLD! POCKET GUIDE TO CHINA - Milton Caniff 1942 U.S. military racist mini-comic

16 posts in this topic

I have here a very nice copy of the scarce and sought after POCKET GUIDE TO CHINA which contains an 11 page mini-comic by Milton Caniff (creator of Steve Canyon and Terry and the Pirates) titled "HOW TO SPOT A JAP". Published by the U.S. Government Printing Office in 1942 for the War and Navy Departments. Story is focused on determining the difference between Japanese and Chinese when experienced in the field of battle. Controversial and ridden with stereotypes.

 

75 pages total. Pages are in excellent condition. Only slight wear to cover edges and corners, and a small smudge on left front cover. A couple small creases and marks. Name and serial number of Sgt. Leroy W. Curtis written in pen on first page. Overall a really nice copy, better than most copies I've seen. This book is CGC-able and other copies have been graded.

 

SOLD!

 

 

img_138_zps3f613f40.jpg

 

img_139_zps8234c4f4.jpg

 

IMG_7433_zpsda093163.jpg

 

IMG_7434_zpsa3af7674.jpg

 

IMG_7435_zps48ca9f21.jpg

 

IMG_7437_zpse6b02ee4.jpg

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holy smokes this is racist

 

In today's context, obviously so. But, in the reference of the environment at the time, and given the "lowest common denominator" audience target, perhaps not. Barely literate conscripts just off the farm in a hostile battlezone probably benefitted from the cartoonish characterization. Embarrassing in today's world - yes. But no more so than most of the political pronouncements on either side of the spectrum today.

 

By the way, to *paull* good luck with the sale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holy smokes this is racist

 

In today's context, obviously so. But, in the reference of the environment at the time, and given the "lowest common denominator" audience target, perhaps not. Barely literate conscripts just off the farm in a hostile battlezone probably benefitted from the cartoonish characterization. Embarrassing in today's world - yes. But no more so than most of the political pronouncements on either side of the spectrum today.

 

By the way, to *paull* good luck with the sale.

 

+1 to that. This was meant to be a useful manuscript. It is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holy smokes this is racist

 

In today's context, obviously so. But, in the reference of the environment at the time, and given the "lowest common denominator" audience target, perhaps not. Barely literate conscripts just off the farm in a hostile battlezone probably benefitted from the cartoonish characterization. Embarrassing in today's world - yes. But no more so than most of the political pronouncements on either side of the spectrum today.

 

By the way, to *paull* good luck with the sale.

 

+1 to that. This was meant to be a useful manuscript. It is.

 

And a piece of our history.

 

GLWTS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holy smokes this is racist

 

In today's context, obviously so. But, in the reference of the environment at the time, and given the "lowest common denominator" audience target, perhaps not. Barely literate conscripts just off the farm in a hostile battlezone probably benefitted from the cartoonish characterization. Embarrassing in today's world - yes. But no more so than most of the political pronouncements on either side of the spectrum today.

 

By the way, to *paull* good luck with the sale.

 

+1 to that. This was meant to be a useful manuscript. It is.

Torture and execution were typical Japanese tactics in that theater of WWII. We were not at war everywhere with enemies who followed our "western" sensibilities or conventions.

 

I'm amazed at those who forget the past, and attempt to rewrite history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holy smokes this is racist

 

In today's context, obviously so. But, in the reference of the environment at the time, and given the "lowest common denominator" audience target, perhaps not. Barely literate conscripts just off the farm in a hostile battlezone probably benefitted from the cartoonish characterization. Embarrassing in today's world - yes. But no more so than most of the political pronouncements on either side of the spectrum today.

 

By the way, to *paull* good luck with the sale.

 

+1 to that. This was meant to be a useful manuscript. It is.

Torture and execution were typical Japanese tactics in that theater of WWII. We were not at war everywhere with enemies who followed our "western" sensibilities or conventions.

 

I'm amazed at those who forget the past, and attempt to rewrite history.

 

If Western states sink to our foes level, in order to win, then we have already lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holy smokes this is racist

 

In today's context, obviously so. But, in the reference of the environment at the time, and given the "lowest common denominator" audience target, perhaps not. Barely literate conscripts just off the farm in a hostile battlezone probably benefitted from the cartoonish characterization. Embarrassing in today's world - yes. But no more so than most of the political pronouncements on either side of the spectrum today.

 

By the way, to *paull* good luck with the sale.

 

+1 to that. This was meant to be a useful manuscript. It is.

Torture and execution were typical Japanese tactics in that theater of WWII. We were not at war everywhere with enemies who followed our "western" sensibilities or conventions.

 

I'm amazed at those who forget the past, and attempt to rewrite history.

 

Actually a pretty even-handed treatment for the time. The goal of the book not being to denigrate so much as save the butts of those soldiers going into a very unfamiliar and quite foreign territory compared to anything they probably grew up in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holy smokes this is racist

 

In today's context, obviously so. But, in the reference of the environment at the time, and given the "lowest common denominator" audience target, perhaps not. Barely literate conscripts just off the farm in a hostile battlezone probably benefitted from the cartoonish characterization. Embarrassing in today's world - yes. But no more so than most of the political pronouncements on either side of the spectrum today.

 

By the way, to *paull* good luck with the sale.

 

+1 to that. This was meant to be a useful manuscript. It is.

Torture and execution were typical Japanese tactics in that theater of WWII. We were not at war everywhere with enemies who followed our "western" sensibilities or conventions.

 

I'm amazed at those who forget the past, and attempt to rewrite history.

 

If Western states sink to our foes level, in order to win, then we have already lost.

 

I'm pretty sure that in reading the book, torture and execution weren't particularly sanctioned within its pages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites