When did minor restoration start getting blue labels?

[Rocketeer]

...Where are the specifics about glue stated?.....

[OldGuy]

...books in general,..... at the sole discretion at CGC very minor color touch or glue may be assigned and marked a color coded "Universal" label , however a description of the detected restoration in general or specific terms will be disclosed.

 

Is "very minor" in the same vein as "way more"?

 

Kinda.

 

Somewhat?

 

Yea, sort of.

[Norrin_Radd]

...books in general,..... at the sole discretion at CGC very minor color touch or glue may be assigned and marked a color coded "Universal" label , however a description of the detected restoration in general or specific terms will be disclosed.

 

Is "very minor" in the same vein as "way more"?

 

Maybe "way less" glue than a PLOD?

[tth2]

This is all supposition though. Someone should call CGC tomorrow and ask so that we're not all sitting here guessing.

 

Get the facts, rather than speculate on conspiracy theories for 25 pages? Get a life!

[Red Hook]

My understanding was that it would not get a PLOD if the glue was not judged to be used with intent to restore....ie if it was in such a place that it was deemed an accidental application. But what's confusing about this is that it is definitely noted as some form of restoration.....this is an odd one I think.

[Silver Surfer]

I think we went over this within the last couple of weeks. They'll note the glue if it isn't sealing a tear or otherwise restoring a book?

 

Either that, or it's a typo.

 

What about the "color touch"?

 

I'm talking about the X-Men #127 above. There's no color touch there. Just glue.

 

What I meant with that question was, if they're that specific about the qualifications for "minor glue restoration", then surely they are as specific about the qualifications for "minor color touch"... so what are the qualifications?

 

Nobody knows that the problem.

[Rocketeer]

My understanding was that it would not get a PLOD if the glue was not judged to be used with intent to restore....ie if it was in such a place that it was deemed an accidental application. But what's confusing about this is that it is definitely noted as some form of restoration.....this is an odd one I think.

 

.....Umm,....if the glue wasn't applied with intent to restore then why else would it be there?.....

[Red Hook]

I'm.....so......confused.

[FFB]

My understanding was that it would not get a PLOD if the glue was not judged to be used with intent to restore....ie if it was in such a place that it was deemed an accidental application. But what's confusing about this is that it is definitely noted as some form of restoration.....this is an odd one I think.

 

I tried that already, but Tim disagreed and tried to make me look dumb. I hate that guy.

[Red Hook]

 

I tried that already, but Tim disagreed and tried to make me look dumb. I hate that guy.

 

Don't worry, FFB....he's just a lawy......um.....nevermind.

[tth2]

My understanding was that it would not get a PLOD if the glue was not judged to be used with intent to restore....ie if it was in such a place that it was deemed an accidental application. But what's confusing about this is that it is definitely noted as some form of restoration.....this is an odd one I think.

 

I tried that already, but Tim disagreed and tried to make me look dumb.

 

Probably the easiest thing I'll do all day today.

[Red Hook]

 

Probably the easiest thing I'll do all day today.

 

And the only thing you won't bill for......

[FFB]

My understanding was that it would not get a PLOD if the glue was not judged to be used with intent to restore....ie if it was in such a place that it was deemed an accidental application. But what's confusing about this is that it is definitely noted as some form of restoration.....this is an odd one I think.

 

I tried that already, but Tim disagreed and tried to make me look dumb.

 

Probably the easiest thing I'll do all day today.

 

True. You're going to spend the rest of the day in the john looking for your wang.

[Red Hook]

He called the Green River a "rank" pedigree!

[FFB]

He called the Green River a "rank" pedigree!

 

He's a 9.2-spitter and a date-stamp hater. What do you expect?

[Rocketeer]

He called the Green River a "rank" pedigree!

 

....rank???,...were they actually in the river?...is that why they smell?.....

[tth2]

My understanding was that it would not get a PLOD if the glue was not judged to be used with intent to restore....ie if it was in such a place that it was deemed an accidental application. But what's confusing about this is that it is definitely noted as some form of restoration.....this is an odd one I think.

 

I tried that already, but Tim disagreed and tried to make me look dumb.

 

Probably the easiest thing I'll do all day today.

 

True. You're going to spend the rest of the day in the john looking for your wang.

 

What are you talking about? John Wang sits right next door to me. I slay myself sometimes.

[Red Hook]

It's like Friday where he is anyway. He must have taken an early weekend.

[tth2]

He called the Green River a "rank" pedigree!

 

He's a 9.2-spitter and a date-stamp hater. What do you expect?

 

Hold on there pilgrim, who said anything about me being a date-stamp hater? I'm perfectly happy to have this date stamp.

 

[Red Hook]

I'd see that scan less if it were your avatar!

 

 

(nice book anyway!)