• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

PGM: ASM 13

13 posts in this topic

I'd be a bit harder on this one than NoMan, maybe average or a bit better copy.

 

So VGF 5.0 - 5.5. Main notes: average wear, spots of surface wear, maybe 6.0 spine/back, the smudge and soil spot mentioned in OP.

 

So what's the big hit?: the soil spot/smudge?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, but only from maybe 6.5 to start. Looking at overall view of the book, the corners, edge wear, and surface wear.

 

My starting point was the overall eye-appeal/grade - a vestige from old school grading. Using that, I started at 6.5 and counted down from there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps I'm going about it wrong. I have a GSXMEN 1 CGC 9.2 that has a very visual bottom left corner ding. I have no idea how it got a 9.2. I realize a lot goes into grading other then corners, but a lot of the books I've looked at in this forum (including this one) have a lot less corner blunting but get dinged hard because of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Post a pic when you can.

 

A lot of squarebound spines can have weird appearance because of glue, but defect can be production and penalized much less. A gorgeous and fresh book with only major defect a major impact dent can get 9.2 (does the dent run through book/are pages affected?).

 

I think slight blunting is penalized less than rounding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites